01/15/85 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I Mr. Goodrich stated that this point could be tested in court and the City oould lose the right to put any oonditions at all on the mining permit. Commissioners Zimmerman and Deemer feel that it should be reconmended that no fill be transported over public thoroughfares and Chairman Peterson and Om~nissioner Hendriksen are not in favor of recommending this oondition. Oc~mission consensus is that Oouncil should include in the permit agreement a oondition that would restrict public access to the property. Con~nission consensus is that ~t should also be included in the agreement that the fact that the City is giving approval to this amount of volt, ne does not lend any indication that the City is allowing any expansion beyond the existing licensed landfill facility located to the north of the subject property. Request To Subdivide Bv Metes And Bounds: Case Of Mr. Rick Foster. River,s _Bend Properties: Mr. Rick Foster was present and requested approval to a metes and bounds subdivision of the northerly 100' of the U.B. property which lies south of the proposed bridge crossing. ~he balance of the property will be platted at a later date. Motion by Commissioner Zin~nerman and seconded by (bmmissioner Dee~ner to reomTmend sketch plan approval of a four acre parcel south of the proposed bridge right-of-way owned by River's Bend Properties; to approve a temporary metes and bounds subdivision of a one plus acre parcel from that property; that the developer proceed to the preliminary plat process; and that the certificate of occupancy for Food and Fuel is contingent upon oompletion of platting. Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairman Peterson, Commissioners }]endriksen, Deemer and Zin~nerman. Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioners LaDue, Kennen and Johnson. Req_uest To Rezone Pro_pertv From U.B. (Urban Business) TO U.M.B. (Urban Multiple Business): Case Of Mr. Rick Foster.- River's Be_r~ ~roper ties: Molly Comeau - DNR - stated that the subject property is under DNR jurisdiction and the density proposed would not be allowed and explained the formula by which allowable density is determined. Mr. Rick Foster - Presented a map dated January 8, 1980 and stated that prior to DNR claiming jurisdiction on this property owned by River's Bend Properties, 65 acres of property was given to the City, County and State with the stipulation that when the time came, River's Bend Properties would be granted certain variances. I~en River's Bend }]ousing Development was approved the developer down zoned it by proposing 3 units per acre rather than the 15 units per acre it was zone as. ~he developer has made a tactical error; we should have kept the land, developed it the way we wanted to and then give some of the property away. N~w, with the property we have left and the DNR restrictions, we can only develop 10% of that 206 acres we started with. Page 8 of 10