My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
03/05/85
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Planning and Zoning
>
Agendas
>
1980's
>
1985
>
03/05/85
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/21/2025 3:54:19 PM
Creation date
7/30/2004 9:24:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Document Title
Planning and Zoning Commission
Document Date
03/05/1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
87
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
that the Watershed Board has the authority to control flooding; the implied <br />law was that by building, you contribute to flooding. <br /> <br />4. Confiscalatory zoning - Case in Wilmar where the City wanted land for a <br />parking lot; the City downzoned the land and took out a first option to <br />purchase the property; the Supreme court ruled in favor of the property owner <br />as the City essentially took the land by zoning rather than paying the owner <br />fair market value. Property owners also won in a case where the City zoned <br />commercial property unbuildable in order to attain enough property needed for <br />airport expansion. <br /> <br />5. With respect to Ordinances regarding shoreland, wild and scenic rivers, <br />critical rivers, flood plain and watershed; none of these ordinances have <br />enforcement power. ~he enforcement power is passed specifically with <br />ordinances initiated by Planning and Zoning commissions. <br /> <br />6. Any decisions made by Planning and Zoning oommissions should be backed up <br />by facts. <br /> <br />7. We are not bound by previous mistakes; we do not have to let previous <br />actions taken that proved to be a mistake, set a precedent. <br /> <br />8. ~he city does have the power to enforce it's conformance standards. <br /> <br />Chairman Peterson inquired as to the consequences if a building was allowed <br />in the flood plain prior to the flood plain ordinance being adopted; can the <br />City enforce eompliance and order the building removed? <br /> <br />Commissioner Zimmerman replied that this type of enforcement would fall under <br />the amortization clause; separate ordinances have to be written for <br />enforcement purposes. <br /> <br />9. Make sure the findings of fact are doc~ented and back up the decision <br />made. <br /> <br />10. With respect to public hearings: a) the purpose is to gain addtional <br />information; b) developer should provide city with all pertinent information; <br />c) don't make a decision on the same night as the hearing in major cases; d) <br />those favoring the proposal should be heard first and those opposed should be <br />heard second; e) persons giving statements should give name and address; f) <br />all statements should be directed to the chairperson; g) all statements <br />should be factual and refrain from repetition; h) do not involve <br />personalities; i) Planning and Zoning Commissions and Councils reserve the <br />right to question any speaker; j) hearing will adjourn after all persons <br />have had the opportunity to be heard; k) republicizing is not required for a <br />hearing continuation; 1) microphones should be used at the hearing; m) <br />as the public hearing in major cases. <br /> <br />11. Minutes should be recorded of meetings and hearings. <br /> <br />Cormmissioner Hendriksen suggested that minutes of this Commission's workshop <br />sessions might have been beneficial as not all members were able to attend all <br />sessions and they might have had input to what was discussed. <br /> February 5, 1985 <br /> <br />Page 5 of 7 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.