Laserfiche WebLink
Motion by Oouncilmember Gpx and seconded by Mayor Heitman to table this case <br />until (buncil's regular meeting scheduled for June 25, 1985. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yesz Mayor Heitman, Gouncilm~bers Sorteberg, (Dx, <br />Reimann and Schlueter. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />~ Bequ_ est For Variance From Platting_ Regu_ irements Of Subdivision <br /> C~_ er~ oa,9 Of Mr. And Mrs. John Brol~ma: <br /> <br />Mrs. ~awas ~e~nt. <br /> <br />Motion by Oouncilmember (Dx and seoonded by (Duncilmember Sorteberg to approve <br />Mr. and Mrs. Brolsma's request for a varianoe from the platting requirements of <br />the subdivision chapter with the provision that ordinances do not presently <br />allow for a building permit to be issue on that p~operty. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Heitman, Gouncilmenbers Sorteberg, (Dx, <br />Reimann and Schlueter. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Requ_ est For Preliminary_ P.U.D. _Ap?royal.. Case Of North Fork. <br /> Inc. {Continued): <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich stated that the proposed resolution for preliminary and <br />final plat approval on Northfork should be r~ised as follows: <br /> <br />Replace language in Item #2.c with: '~hat there be an agreenent for the <br />financial responsibility relating to Ramsey's and applicant's share of <br />improvements to Jarvis Street adjacent to the subject plat.' <br /> <br />Add Item ~2.e: '~hat the plat may not be filed until the P.U.D. zoning <br />ordirmnce is effective. ~hat the developer is advised that any on-site <br />improvements constructed prior to filing the plat will be made at it's <br />own risk. ' <br /> <br />Oouncilm~mber Schlueter recalled that there was some doubt as to the <br />buildability of t~o of the lots. <br /> <br />Mr. Raatikka stated that one lot will be filled and the lot lime of the other <br />lot has been extended in order to pr~ide more buildable soil area. <br /> <br />(Duncilmember Schlueter inquired as to the status of the City's request for <br />access across Burlington Northern Railroad crossing. <br /> <br />Mr. Schnelle stated that the request for access across Burlington Northern has <br />been withdrawn; with the revised plat there is ~o need for p~hlic access across <br />the crossing. <br /> <br />(Duncilmember Schlueter noted that the developers will be using the crossing in <br />their marketing process and the crossing is intended to be used in emergency <br />situations. <br /> <br />Mr. Schnelle stated that it will be the developer's responsibility to restrict <br />access; that acoess will only be opened up to the public in an emergency <br /> June 11, 1985 <br /> <br />Page 9 of 14 <br /> <br /> <br />