Laserfiche WebLink
Go,missioner Hendriksen seoonded the motion.. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: f~airman Peterson, C~nissionners ~--~er, <br />Zismerman, Hendriksen and Johnson. Voting No: None. Absent: C~,,.issioners <br />LaDue a~d Kennen. <br /> <br />~ Regu_ est For Sketch Plan Review Of Replattin_~_ Including_ Variance <br /> To Lot Size Requ_ irements; C.a~,e of Me__adow_ Brook Estates' <br /> <br />Michael Petrucci was present and stated that the plat was approved with six 2- <br />1/2 acre lots; the developers are unable to develop the property profitably <br />when oonsidering the oost of purchasing the property, the (Dst of road <br />construction and interest rates; requesting a variance to lot size requir~ments <br />in order to develop 1 acre lots and realize a profit on the develo[m~nt. Mr. <br />Petrucci also noted that legislation was passed recently granting <br />municipalities more rights in the way of granting variances to see that <br />develoImm, nt occurs. Mr. Petrucci also noted that developed areas surrounding <br />his plat is one acre lots. <br /> <br />O0~nissioner Zi~merman noted that the City cannot grant variances based on <br />economic factors; and that there isn't anywhere in Ramsey that you can develop <br />and not have 1 acre develolm~nts nearby. <br /> <br />The Qm~ission stated that the City's policy not to go with 1 acre develounent <br />is based on the fact that the City just recently w~nt from a 1 in 10 density to <br />a 1 in 2-1/2 density and to avoid health hazards that create a ~ for <br />municipal sewer and water. <br /> <br />Motion by Qmmissioner Deemer and seconded by Qmmissioner Zim~e~ to deny <br />the request to replat Meadow Brook Estates to one acre lots and to advise the <br />applicant not to proceed with any further platting. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairman Peterson, (kmmtissioners Deemer, <br />Zimmerman, Johnson and Hendriksen. Voting No: None. Absent: G0a~sioners <br />LaDue and Kennen. <br /> <br />Case ~: Requ_ est For Variance From Platting Requ_ irements Of Subdivision <br /> Chapter; Case Of ~. Towle And J. Duff.. <br /> <br />John Pavelich of Leaman Realty was present. <br /> <br />The Commission reco~me~ that the applicant return to the Planning Oamtission <br />with an overall design for the entire parcel of property including, at least, <br />an easement for access road to the property to the west. <br /> <br />~ Requ_ est For Variance From Platting_ Requ_ irements Of Subdivision <br /> Cha_pter: Case Of Phyllis Lahn~ <br /> <br />The O0~ission reoo~nended that Ms. [ahn go with a platting procedure. <br /> <br />Regu_ est For Grading and Excavating_ Permit; Case of Art Raudio: <br /> June 4, 1985 <br /> <br />Page 4 of 6 <br /> <br /> <br />