Agenda - Council - 01/22/1985 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! I ~ission ~oted the follc~ing: l. Regular City ~uncil meetdng minutes dated l~bet 13, 1984. 2. I~egular City O~uncll ~eetin9 minutes date~ I~c~ber 27, 1984. ~ISSIO~ BUS IN~S ~ l~eo~est ~ Plin~ For l~fill (2over l~terial: ~e Of l~te ~q~nent Of MirlDesot~. Inc.: City Attorney (k~rich stated that according to Ci~ ~itio~l ~e ~it ~a ~t r~uire a r~~tion or action ~ Pl~i~ ~ ~ W~ ~~nt ~ ~~ for a ~ni~ ~it tn order ~ ~in ~is ~ission's in~t, vi~, ~ ~ha~er 9ui~s you ~ 9ive ~. ~mcil is ~t ~es~rily l~king for a r~~tion on whe~er or a~rove ~e r~st ~t ra~er ~at ~itions ~uld ~ci] ~ci~ ~ a~rove ~e City l%ttorne)' Goodrich referred to City Engineer Raatikka's letter dated November 30, 1984 and stated that the Tri-Co property is within that area designated as Site P in the Oounty's Landfill Inventory' List. Whenever a site is designated as a potent/al landfill, t~r the Waste Management Act, there is a moratoriu~ on that site and outlyirg adjacent properties. In this instance, it appears that the subject properby would be a part of the fill area should Site P be selected. ~e Oounty and Metro Ovuncil ~ have some concern that if the minin9 permit is granted and should Site P beoome a reality and the fill had been r~oved, there would ~o longer be adequate fill on the site. If Ramsey does grant this mining permit, it ~ be subject to (bunty and Metro Oouncil approval. [~r. (k~lrich stated that he will also advise (bur~i] that they can procccd in this case with the understanding that this ~ratorium does exist and that the applicant will have to 9et a waiver ol release to that moratori~ if mining is to occur on the property. Mr. (kxxlrich stated that Waste l~anag~ment's original application would have required an EAW; it is mandatory to require an EAW when the request involves 40 or ~re acres and a mean depth of 10'. Subsequently, the applicant has made revisions in order to fall ~ithin the ~nchtory requir~pent. ~r. (k~rich stated that the Plannir~ (k~ssion should look at beginnig ending times of activity, hours of operation, fencing, dust oontrol, erosion. control, where Waste Management will be hauling. O~issioner 2in~er~n inquired if W~ste I~lna~J~t still needs Metro O~unci] permission even t~ugh an E~ is not required. Pit. (boOrich replied that they would. Be also stated that the Metro Oouneil will not withhold permission because they don't feel it is right for Ramsey; they will withhold because they want to have a lar~fill at that location. llr. Don Otter - Waste Mana~t Of Minnesota, Inc. - Stated that Waste pmnagement is aware that they need Metro Oouncil approval of the mining. Page 3 of 10