My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 02/26/1985
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1985
>
Agenda - Council - 02/26/1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 9:07:21 AM
Creation date
8/3/2004 11:00:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
02/26/1985
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
364
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
l:ebruary 13, 19B5 <br /> <br />Mr. Paul Smith <br />Metropolitan Council <br />300 Metro Square Building <br />St. Paul, M~ 55101 <br /> <br />.'/ <br /> <br />Dear Mr. Smith, <br /> <br />Please accept the following comments from the City of Burnsville on the <br />Metropolitan Council's new "Solid Waste t~nagement Development Guide/Policy <br />Plan". We apologize for the lateness of this submission. <br /> <br />One area of concern is the Plan's provision for fairly immediate, mandatory <br />local ordinances that would require source separation of identified recyclab!es <br />and compostable yard-waste materials. We believe that it is too early to <br />establish this preference for source separation over centralized separation. <br />Moreover, the City of Burnsville is on record in support of an alternative <br />position espoused by the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities (A~), <br />the Municipal Caucus, and the Dakota County Legislative Committee. Essentially, <br />these groups believe that it is preferable to first engage in sustained public <br />education efforts and voluntary recycling programs such as the one now underway <br />in St. Louis Park. If experience shows that this more moderate approach fails <br />to sufficiently stem the flow of the waste stream into regional landfills, then <br />perhaps we would support the more bureaucratic and governmentally intrusive <br />course of action now proposed by the Metropolitan Council. <br /> <br />A second area of concern arises out of our special status.as the host for <br />two (2) operating landfills. In that regard, we endorse many of the points <br />raised by the City of Ramsey in its memorandum of January 22, 1985 to the <br />Metropolitan Council. We too believe that the presence of landfills within <br />our community results in unrealized tax base, and the loss of economic opportunities. <br />The "Plan", with its extension of the useful lives of landfills, only exacerbates <br />this adverse impact. Furthermore, future landfill deposits under the "Plan" <br />wil] be concentrated residues that will arguably increase the potential for <br />environmental and human health hazards. Additionally, we agree with the City <br />of Ramsey that the nature of landfills makes it impossible to assess them for <br />a fair share of the cost of constructing nearby municipal improvements. This <br />consequence is a particularly timely concern of the City of Burnsville as it <br />struggles to induce quality development in the northern sector of the City that <br />contains the two (2) existing landfills. For all of these reasons, it is <br />regrettable that the "Plan" provides little discussion of the impacts to host <br />communities of existing and future landfills. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.