Laserfiche WebLink
this issue further consideration and will report his findings at the <br />~ meetingu' c nra ns .,~ .~o dated ~ r 9 <br /> ~k EncIos re (D~-I) o t a st m p 11 I , 1985, the <br /> final draft of the joint powers a~reement dated ~pril ~6, 19~5, <br /> Mr. Bob Hutchison~s letter dat~ May 3, 1985 and a p~oposed <br /> <br /> It ts our understandin~ that the other communities have or ~ill be <br /> acting on this item shortly. <br /> <br /> You~ action ~ill ~ to a~p~ove of the joi~t ~e~s a~es~ent for the <br /> Lo~er R~ Rive~ Watep Management Or~anization, Unanimous ~nsens~s <br /> of the ~o~B~il is peq~iped ~o ~ispe~se ~ith the peadi~B of the <br /> proposed ~esol~tion. The follo~in~ p~o~sed ~otion is hereby <br /> <br /> Resolution ,85- app~ovinB the joi,t ~,e~s a,~e~nt fop <br /> the Lo~ep Ru~ Rive~ Wate~ ~nagement O~Ganization. please ~efe~ <br /> to ~esolution file fo~ Resolution ~5- . <br /> <br /> Further discussion: <br /> <br />Motion carried/failed. Voting yes <br />Vot lng no . <br /> <br />Item B: ~onsii~{tion of ~{treets {n Rum River Hills P.U.D.: <br /> <br />The developers originally requested that the City do this project by <br />petition and assess it back to them. A feasibility study ~as done <br />and a public hearing ~as held on April 9~ 1985. Subsequent to those <br />actions, the developers have decided to do the project without the <br />City. <br /> <br />Accordingly, so the files sho~ a final action in this matter~ ~e feel <br />adoption of the resolution enclosed as (I~-m) would be appropriate. <br /> <br />Council P~:tion: <br /> <br />Your action will be to adopt the proposed ~esolution. Uaninimous <br />consensus of the Council is ~equi~ed to dispense with the reading of <br />the proposed resolution. The following proposed m?tio~is hereby <br />submitted for yOur consideration: { ~ ~ ~ ~- <br /> <br /> Resolution #85- ~elievinD the City of the responsibility of <br /> providing funding for the improvements in Rum River Hills P.U.D. <br /> Please refer to v-esolution file for Resolution #85- . <br /> <br />Further discussion: <br /> <br />Motion carried/failed. <br />Voting no <br /> <br />Voting yes <br /> <br /> <br />