Laserfiche WebLink
P& Z-2- <br />8/7/78 <br /> <br />Ksthy Schneider asked who would be responsible for determining what <br />type of screening is adequate. 'As it was determined that it would be <br />the responsibility of either Clayton Berg or Mr. Schnelle, Ron West <br />stated that some kind of guideline be discussedf. It was ascertained that <br />fencing would be most feasible. <br /> <br />Ken Peterson questioned the need of a bdu~la or, carS!presently on the <br />property. Mr. Kerssen explained that two of them belonged to his brother <br />for use in demo-derbies and would be removed soon, and that the car and <br />truck in the field would be junked. Ken Peterson asked about what type <br />of noise would be generated from this type of business. Mr. Kerssen ex- <br />plained that the noise of the ginder was less than the noise of someone <br />mowing their lawn~ and that his neighbors have never commented on any noise, <br />A1 Sorteberg stated that he was interested in restrictions which would call <br />for adequate screening and a limited number of vehicles.along road. <br /> <br />Motion by Ron West~ seconded by Art Dunn to recommend to the City Council <br />to grant a conditional use permit to Phillip Kerssen:to allow him to sell <br />and manufactur~ trailers in his garage along with selling any items taken <br />in trade.on his property located at 14765 Nowthen Blvd., subject to the <br />f01]_o~',ing conditions: <br /> 1.) A ma×imum of three items of any combination (trailer or trade-in) <br /> be on display with all other items adequately screened. <br /> <br /> 2.) Ali. raw materials be stored out of sight from road and adjacent <br /> <br />3.) <br /> <br />proper2~ owners. <br /> <br />Motion carried 5-1. <br /> <br />That the two demo-derby cars, and the car and truck in fidld be <br />removed. <br /> Kathy Schneider opposed. <br /> <br />Item 2. Variance request - Alex Werz. <br />Mr. and Mrs. Alex Werz were present to explain that they purchased a <br />1 acre lot from J.D. Scott at 16960 Bison Street N.W. in August 1972. <br />Now they have an interested buyer and because of the ordinance requiring <br />that the lot having to be recorded prior to April 27, !972~ they are <br />paying taxes on a lot they can not obtain a building permit for. <br /> <br />Mr. Werz explained that Mr. Landol Locher was the attorney at the time, <br />and believes that they had paid half his fee on the transaction and <br />was never told that the lot was not buildab!e. <br /> <br />Gerry Zimmer~an stated that Mr. Werz should have had his ovm attorney, <br />and would like an opinion fro~ the City attorney in regards to tthe- <br />present situation. <br /> <br />A1Sortebarg stated that he realized this was riOt"the Werz's fault, but <br />agrees the~ ~bould have had own attorney and then this would have sho~,m <br />up in a title searbh, and that he was in favor of granting a variance. <br /> <br />Mr. Werz stated that he felt the City should grant a variance so that <br />a house coul~ be built in order to increase the taxes on the prope~y. <br /> <br />Kathy Schneider exolained that she was concerned ~.~th how many others <br />would be coming in on Bison Street with the same ~roblem, and the exact <br />location of the lot should be determined for-easement purposes. She <br />stated that she was not opposed to granting the variance, but wished to <br /> <br /> <br />