Laserfiche WebLink
5.03: Public Hearing: Consider a Request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Zoning <br />Amendment, Preliminary Plat and Variances regarding Front Yard and Side Corner Setbacks, Cul-De- <br />Sac Length, and Lot Depth Standards for a proposed development, Brookfield 8th Addition (Project <br />#16-78); Case of Brookfield Land, LLC <br />Public Hearing <br />Chairperson Levine called the public hearing to order at 7:28 p.m. <br />Presentation <br />City Planner Anderson presented the staff report stating the purpose of this case is to review a <br />development of a twenty-six (26) lot, single family residential subdivision, proposed by Brookfield Land <br />LLC (the "Applicant"), on Outlot A, Brookfield 2nd Addition and PID #09-32-25-44-0017 (together, the <br />"Subject Property"). The site is generally located south of Trott Brook and west of Olivine Street. The <br />Applicant has submitted an application for the following: Comprehensive Plan Amendment to reguide a <br />portion of the Subject Property from Rural Developing to Low Density Residential, Request for Rezoning <br />a portion of the Subject Property from R-1 Residential (Rural Developing) to R-1 Residential (MUSA), <br />Preliminary Plat, and Variances to Cul-De-Sac Length, Front Yard and Side Corner Setbacks, and Lot <br />Depth requirements. Staff reviewed the Planning Case in detail and recommended approval of the <br />requests. <br />Citizen Input <br />Commissioner VanScoy stated in general he supported the requests. He asked how the property would <br />be buffered. <br />City Planner Anderson discussed with the Commission how the site would be buffered noting the <br />wetland space around the property would create proper separation to the properties along 166th <br />Avenue. <br />Steve Bona, Capstone Homes, updated the Commission on the Brookfield 6th Addition project noting the <br />last homes were being constructed. He explained the streets were recently paved for the Brookfield 7th <br />Addition and homes would begin construction shortly. He thanked staff for providing the Commission <br />with a thorough staff report and noted this was a challenging piece of land. He believed that this parcel <br />would create beautiful lots and was worth the extra effort. He appreciated staff's efforts to ensure <br />sheds and decks could be built on the lots and then reviewed how his homes would fit on the proposed <br />lots. He believed that shallower homes would fit on the smaller lots and requested no lots be lost within <br />the plan. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill asked if the development would have an HOA. <br />Mr. Bona did not anticipate the development would have an HOA but would have covenants in place <br />with the County. <br />Commissioner Bauer questioned if the two lots in question could have a condition in place to require the <br />homes not be more than 36 feet deep. <br />DRAFT Planning Commission Minutes Excerpt October 6, 2016 <br />