Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> I <br />I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br /> I <br />I <br /> <br /> I <br />;I <br />I <br /> ! <br /> <br />Section 7 <br /> <br />CAB STUDY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION <br /> <br />After careful analysis of development forecasts for the CAB service area and <br />deliberation of the principal issues pertaining to population, employment forecasts, <br />timing and staging of the GAB facility, alignment and capacities, the committee has <br />agreed as part of the Phase Ill activity on a set of recommendations once reviewed and <br />concurred with by the member municipalities, will be forwarded to the Metropolitan <br />Waste Control Commission and Metropolitan Council for consider'erich and inclusion <br />in the 1977 Metropolitan YVaste Control Commission development program. <br /> <br />CA[} Facilities Des ,fpr_~_.._C_on~si_derations <br /> <br />]. That capacity in addition to the present 60-inch stub in Brook]yn Park be provided <br /> m order to fully utilize the design capacity within the CAB facility, <br /> <br />2, That wherever possible the new pipe is to incorporate grade saving techniques oUCh <br /> as "T" section manholes, <br /> <br />3 That the minimum grade recommended in the CAB facility study be evaluat,~s in <br /> terms of probable costs to the facility and local collection system. <br /> <br />4. That due consideration be given to the feasibility of realigning the Champlin <br /> segment of' the CAB along Trunk Iffig]~way !69. <br /> <br />5. That should the Imoka segment of the CAB serving the City of Ramsey be lowered in <br /> , . .~t~::~on in Champ].Jn be evaluated to <br /> elew:~tion an alternate site for the pumpir:.q q -'~' <br /> reduce the need for deep cuts in Champlin. <br /> <br />6. That consideration be given to the addition of pumping facilities whe~*e long-term <br /> service area and local service costs are a significant factor. <br /> <br />7. That Jn programming the timing and staging the construction of the GAB fac~,~y"'~, <br /> consic.l~r~.tion should be given to extending or exoanding sewer service where <br /> documented pollution or sewer service problems exist on a firstproc.' ~'"~y bas~_s' . <br /> <br />8. That alternatives of providing interceptor service to wdstern Anoka utilizing the <br /> reserve capacity in the Anoka treatment plant be considered,. <br /> <br />9. 1'hat the unallocated reserve capacity be proportioned throughout the system <br /> and final allocation based on Metropolitan Developraent Framework policies. <br /> <br />]0. That in the Step II phase of preparing detailed design and specifications, careful <br /> consideration be given in selecting a configuration that will minimize where <br /> practical the impact on the local collection system, <br /> <br /> <br />