Laserfiche WebLink
CITY OF RAMSEY <br />COUNTY OF ANOKA <br />STATE OF MINNESOTA <br /> <br />A regular meeting of the Council's Economic Development Commission was <br />held on January 10, 1979 at the RamseyMunicipal Center, 15153 Nowthen <br />Blvd. N.W. Ramsey, Minnesota. <br /> <br />~e meeting was called to order at 7:45 P.M. <br /> <br />Present: <br /> <br />Councilman Robert Muller <br />Mr. Don Greenberg <br />Ms. Theresa Henderson <br />Mr. Allan Sorteberg <br />Mr. Boyd Hanson <br /> <br />Absent: Mr. Roger Meyers <br /> <br />Also Present: <br /> <br />Mayor Tom Gamec <br />Lloyd Schnelle, City Administrator <br />Peter Raatikka, City Engineer <br />Mr. Ron West, Planning & Zoning Commission member <br />Mr. Art Dun, Planning & Zoning Commission member <br />Ms. Kathy Schneider, Planning ~ Zoning Commission member <br />Mr. Evan Green, State Transportation Department <br />Mr. Joel Katz, State Transportation Department <br />Mr. Arnold Peltzer, concerned citizen <br /> <br />Chairman Muller explained to the two representatives of the Minnesota <br />Department of Transportation why this Commission had requested their <br />presence at this meeting. Chairman Muller stated the City was very con- <br />cerned about the proper planning of Highway #10 in the future and they <br />wanted to know what the Minnesota State Transportation Department future <br />planning plans were for State Highway #10. Mr. Green stated their <br />immediate future plans were the signalization at the following inter- <br />sections of County Roads #57 and #56. However,' he stated bit lettings <br />for the above mentioned intersections would not be until February 1981 <br />due to its priority in regards to other demands within the District. <br />He did state the City should adopt resolutions requesting the above <br />signalization. <br /> <br />In the long range planning of Highway #10, Mr. Green and Mr. Katz~ <br />Minnesota Transportation Department, stated that Highway #10 is going <br />o be the only major highway serving this area. Consequently, they <br />stated now development will have to be closely monitored. The City <br />should develop service roads where possible. They said the State <br />would participate in costs of these service roads where new business <br />frontage was restricted to the service road. They also stated that <br />in the future cross overs would be restricted to every half mile or <br />mile (preferably every mile). They also intimated that present cross <br />overs where they created a safety hazard and did not fall within the <br />above perameters might be closed except those'cross overs where it was <br />provided in the property deed. <br /> <br /> <br />