07/02/79 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

4/2/79 Item 6. Walter Knackstedt Mr. K'na~kstedt was present to explain .that he has access to his propet, ty, however, that it doe§ not have frontage on a.public street and he wants to use a deeded access through his neighbors property for access. The Commission ad- vised him that it would be to his benefit to request permission to construct a street using the deeded easement, and also suggested he contact Mr. Brown with the possiblity of selling him a portion of the property to alleviate his problem of being landlocked. ~It was pointed out that even though he does have access to the rear of the property from a.city street, there would be problems with services to the property. Gerry Zimmerman arrived 10:30 p.m. Item7. Hedstrom Electric - Request for Variance Mr. Hedstrom was present requesting variances to allow him to build additions onto existing buildings which presently do not meet the sideyard setback re- quirments. It was pointed out thal~ he would have to handle the drainage problem and Mr. Hedstrom stated]:~hat everyone elses property was draining onto his, and this was the City's problem, not his. Mr. Goodrich suggested that he obtain drainage easements,, and Mr. Hedstrom stated that if it is going %o get so in- volved, he would just forget the building planned for the rear of the property, and just add on to the present ones. Ken Peterson explained that he would have to show a plan which provided adequate parking without using the area over the present septic syst6m. Ron West asked if he would be willing to handle the drainage problem if variances were gr'anted? Ken Peterson explained that this would mean a plan that would meet with the Engineer's approval. Mr. Goodrich stated that the variances would be considered by the Board of Adjustment. The Commission recommended that Mr. Hedstrom revise his site plan to eliminate parking over the septic area, to indicate an approved drainage plan, and adequate parking area, and also recommended that the Board of Adjustment allow variances if Mr. Hedstrom would reduce the length of block building to be in line with the other and deed enough footage to the City for a future extension · of Front Street. It was the consensus of the COn~ission that the Board of Adjustment should conduct a public hearing on the request for variances, and if it is their 'decision to grant them, that the variances be contingent' on final review by the Plbnning Commission of the drainage, parking, and scfeening for the site.. Also requested will be a variance for the setback requirement on the new proposed storage building in the rear of property. ' 'Items 8 & 9. Site Plan and Design Review and 'Lot size in commercial and Indbstrial. ~abled due to lateness and items remaining on agenda. Item 10. Vac6ncies On::Plannin9 and Zoning' Due to Mr. Sorteberg accepting the vacant council seat, and Mr. Brad Bodles intent to resign, Mr. Schnelle asked for a motion to allow them to advertise the vacancies. Motion by Art Dunn, seconded by Ron West that the City advertise' for two weeks in the April 6 & 13th issues with a deadline' of April l!Sth to apply and interviews on April 19th at 7:30 p.m. Motion carried 5-0. Item 11. Klemish Sketch Plan .. MP. Ed Klemish was pmesent with a sketch plan located nomth of Shady Lawn Estates with less than 9.5. acme lot size. The consensus of the commission J'"-'-' was to deny the plat and advised M~. Klemish that he could eitheP go to the Council, om pPoceed with a plat of 2.5 acme lots. MP. Klemish stated that' he felt this was the best division of the parcel, and if mequired to have 9.5 acme lots, he would have to give money in lieu of pa~k land adjacent to ?z'ott .i"~ · B~ook. M~. Klemish was infomed that the sketch plan needs reviewal by the Park Commlss~on first, and in the event he revises the sketch he should plan ' /:. .' on still showin~ land rom dedication to pa~ks.- The consensus of the 'commission ' was that if by dedicatinE land, the lot size of the lots adjacent to the b~ook