Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Kenneth Peterson <br />September 28, 1979 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />corner of the site will not drain into the drywells~ The site <br />plans should be revised to show how the runoff from the'entire <br />site will be disposed of . Maintaining all runoff on the site <br />may r~quire property line curbs. Also calculations of the size <br />and capacity of the existing drywells should be provided. <br /> <br />5.. The site plans indicate that the driveway to the building will <br /> be class five gravel. We would recommend that this. be changed <br /> to a hard, all-weather, dust-free surface as required for parking <br /> areas. <br /> <br />Since this proposed building is being placed in the rear of a <br />presently developed commercial lot, no buffering or boulevard <br />sodding should be required. <br /> <br />As previously discussed i~t does not appear likely that a service <br />drive will be constructed on the north edge of the site. However; <br />we would recommend that rear yard setback of 35 feet be adhered to. <br />This would eliminate alternate site plan "A" as a possible ~ayout. <br /> <br />If you have any questions in regard to this site plan please let us know. <br /> <br />Yours truly, <br /> <br />CONSULTING ENGINEERS DIVERSIFIED, INC. <br />Peter R. Raatikka, P.E. <br /> <br />CC: <br /> <br />Zoning Members <br />Lloyd Schnelle, City Adm. <br />Wally Berg <br /> <br />File: <br /> <br />RT2:15-75 <br /> <br /> <br />