Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />S~nce the original zoning, the Aydt property has been rezoned and <br />the body shop is being operated with a conditional use permit. <br /> <br />The Lee's Landscaping property has been sold and is currently being <br />used for storage, we understand. <br /> <br />The only property used even close to what was originally intended <br />is the Deemer property and that is not exactly what it used to be. <br /> <br />It would be our opinion that any zoning changes at this time would <br />have to be ini%iated by the property owner and not by either the City <br />or a neighboring property owner. So much has transpired in the last <br />several years to make any changes. <br /> <br />This item is informational and no action will be necessary on your <br />part. A copy of the zoning map and zoning ordinance are included <br />as enclosure (D2-a) for your information. <br /> <br />CASE %3: PARK DEDICATION FEES - RURAL AREA: <br /> <br />This item was brought before you at a previous meeting and at that <br />time you appointed two of your members to work on this issue. To <br />date we have not received any solid recommendation nor do we know <br />if anything has been done. We have heard rumors of a proposal to <br />use bedrooms, bathrooms, etc. in determining park fees but we have <br />not seen anything concrete. Hopefully, the recommendation will be <br />for something that is simple to compute and easily administered keeping <br />in mind that it will only apply to 10 acre densities. <br /> <br />Enclosure (D2-b) contains a copy of the Park Board meeting minutes <br />of August 18, 1983. Their consensus in this matter was that the park <br />fees be compiled on only the developable land and not include the <br />outlots in the computations. We feel that this is an equitable <br />solution. <br /> <br />Commission Action: Your action in this matter will be to make a <br />recommendation to the City Council on what you feel is an equitable <br />solution to this problem. The following proposed motion is hereby <br />submitted for your consideration: <br /> <br />Motion by and seconded by to recommmend <br />amending that section of the ordinance that deals with park <br />dedication fees as follows: <br /> <br />(NOTE: You must make a recommendation, as this will be <br />going to the City Council for their September meeting.) <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting yes <br />Voting no . <br /> <br />CASE %4: METES AND BOUNDS SUBDIVISION; OUTLOT B OF OOUNTRYSIDE ESTATES: <br /> <br />For some time, the City has been trying to acquire the southerly portion <br />of 0utlot B in Countryside Estates for a drainage easement they need <br />quite badly. <br /> <br />Page 2 of 4 <br /> <br /> <br />