Laserfiche WebLink
2. The construction of the Rum River extens±on at this time will <br /> pc, rln.~t Anoka t:o serve a limited number of homes in the Dtmham <br /> O,'~,ks suhd:i, vision without a lift station. <br /> <br />3. Andover's ~p!anned need for possible service ~hrough the Rum <br /> ]liver exl~eusion is beyond 1985. <br /> <br />4. The }!WCC ?01 Northwest Area Study has not yet de~ermzned if <br /> t']:e Rmn Rfver extension and its eventual extension to the <br /> rzneast interceptor is the most cost-effective <br /> o>:ist~ng Ano].~a No '-' <br /> a]t_ernat~ve of serving western Andover. <br /> <br />5. Th~rc~. a~-e viable, loug-term alternative corridors for the <br /> Rim] ~" <br /> ~,.~vc~r extension if it is not constructed at this time, <br /> and its currently proposed corridor becomes occupied by Anoka's <br /> ].ocal streets and utilities. <br /> <br />1. That ~he }[etropolitan Council not consider amending the 208 <br /> Water Quality Plan to include the extension of the Anoka <br /> ~n~.erceptor .... om Nighway 47 to the Rum River at this time <br /> b,?cause the need for the extension cannot be demonstrated. <br /> <br />2. 'i']';~t the determination of tNe need and timing for the extension <br /> ef the Anoka interceptor from Nighway 47 to the Rum. River be <br /> ..'~ddro.~;s~:d when the alternative to serve western Andever is <br /> ~-eCO:h~m-_-nded by the ~,R,.}CC 201 Northwest Area Study. <br /> <br />hS: i m <br />A t: ~: a c h. <br /> <br /> <br />