Laserfiche WebLink
CASE #4: <br /> <br />CASE #5: <br /> <br />2) Letter from City Attorney to the developer inform- <br />ing him of the Council's action taken on April 22, 1980. <br /> <br />Comments: The City Attorney has not received the abstract <br />on Pondvale Estates. Consequently, we still don't have that <br />requirement. Council action taken in enclosure (D2-f) I <br />would think still'stands. I see no point in granting final <br />plat as it appears to be only a pl~y for a longer delay of <br />time. <br /> <br />BOARD OF REVIEW: <br /> <br />The following items should be addressed by Council: <br /> <br />a) Board of Review Resolution #80-1 adopted by Council <br />directed that the City furnish copies of it to the following: <br /> <br />1) Anoka County Board to get their support and assistance <br />to get the tax law revamped. ~ <br /> <br />2) Governor of State of Minnes0ta to get their action on <br />tax law reform. <br />3) Commissioner of Revenue to get their action on tax <br />law reform. <br />4) CommDssioner of State Economic Development to get <br />their action on tax law reform. <br /> <br />Accordingly, the letters have been prepared with your Board <br />of Review Resolution #80-1 as enclosure #1 to it. The letters <br />are made out for Council's signatures. Please refer to en- <br />closure (D2-g) for the letters. Council will have to sign <br />them at this meeting. <br /> <br />b) City Assessor's Staff Report: According to Lester's <br />Staff Report we still may be over the 1% decrease in valuation. <br />In speaking to Lester, it appears he may have missed some of <br />the parcels when he was going back through his book which <br />would be very easy. However, what really irritates one is <br />that the County has a complete run-off on this and they let <br />Lester go through his books instead of using the computer <br />list. We should know by the Council meeting where we are <br />on this matter. <br /> <br />It appears according to Lester's report the assessing Will ~ <br />be again starting out on the same path with valuations. This <br />is why we need action on revamping these tax laws as we're <br />asking for in paragraph a above. <br /> <br />MAJOR CHANGES TO RECREATION OPEN SPACE I~TROPOLITAN DEVELOP- <br /> <br />MENT GUIDE PLAN: <br /> <br />This was before Council at your meeting of June 10, 1980 and <br />it will be before'the Park and Recreation Commission meeting <br />on June 19, 1980. <br /> <br /> <br />