My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 10/12/2004
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2004
>
Agenda - Council - 10/12/2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/24/2025 2:32:41 PM
Creation date
10/11/2004 7:45:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
10/12/2004
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
356
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CIVP Storage: Site Plan Review <br />,Amc 25, 2004 <br />Revised.' July 9, 200¥, October 7, 2004 <br />Page 2 of 4 <br /> <br /> · The 8-inch watermain along the northern boundary, (west of the loop to the south) may be <br /> eliminated provided that the 8-inch segment with the hydrant is extended to the Ramsey <br /> Blvd. right-o~'-way llne. " <br /> <br /> · Drainage and utility easements must be provided'on ~he final plat document' over all <br /> sanita~ sewer and watermain lines. <br /> <br />Setbacks: The proposed buildings on the subject property meet or exceed the required 35-foot <br />front and rear yard and 20-foot side yard setback requirements. The site plan also shows a 60-foot <br />bufferyard between the proposed development and the residential property tO the east, but not to <br />the north. The bufferyard to the east meets the dimensional requirements in the E-1 District, but <br />the bufferyard to the north does not. The site plan must be revised to meet this requirement. <br /> <br />City Code also requires a 20-foot setback between public streets and parking and maneuvering <br />areas. The proposed turnaround area at the terminus of 148th Avenue does not meet this standard. <br /> <br />Fence: At their July 1, 2004 meeting the Planning Commission recommended the installation of <br />a privacy-~pe fence along the subject property's common property lines with residential <br />properties to the east, north, and south. The site plan still indicates an 8-foot chain link fence; the <br />site plan will need to be revised to reflect the recommendation of the Planning Commission. <br /> <br />Landscaping: A revised landscaping plan, dated October 6, 2004, has been received. The <br />revised plan indicates that thirty-three (33) trees and 103 shrubs will be installed. In addition, <br />there are roughly fifty-five (55) existing trees that will be preserved, resulting in a total of eighty- <br />eight (88) trees on site. The planting schedule contains an adequate mix of conifers, deciduous <br />overstory trees and deciduous ornamental trees. ~All species and sizes are acceptable as well. <br /> <br />The required plantings, however, based on the square footage' of the buildings, combined with the <br />required bufferyard planting~ along the north and east property lines, results in the need for <br />seventy-eight (78) trees and 261 shrubs. At least eighteen (18) of the trees'and sixty (60) of the <br />shrubs should be located within a sixty (60) foot buffer strip along both the north and east <br />property lines. <br /> <br />While the minimum number of required trees is being satisfied, an additional 158 shrubs must be <br />incorporated into the plan. A majority of these shrubs should be located along the north property <br />line and around the proposed drainage pond along the eas~ property line to fulfill the bufferyard <br />planting requirements. Several species, which are appropriate for both wet and dry sites, that are <br />recommended are False Indigo (Amorphafruit. icosa), European Cranberrybush (Viburnum <br />opulus), American Eider (Sambucus pubens), Red Osier Dogwood (Cornzt$ sericea), and <br />Common Ninebark (?hysocarpus.o. pulifoliu,r). Multiple species should be utilized to enhance <br />the diversity of the plantings. <br /> <br />An alternative method for screening in certain business districts is fencing that is 100% opaque. <br />While this does not eliminate the planting requirements, it does reduce the required bufferyard <br />plantings by 10%. This alternative [s not included in the E-1 Employment district, however, it <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.