Agenda - Council - 10/12/2004 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Final S itc Plan Reivw - Comer Retail Building Town Center 3rd Addition October 7, 2004 Pa~e 2 of 8 that the (uel pump island remains at 430 sq. ft.; the 1,777 sq. foot car wash is being eliminated; corner retail store building is reduced from the prelimina~ site plan to 13,000 sq. ft.; and two other commercial buildings have been increased to 20,000 square feet. The total amount of building l:botprint proposed at preliminary site plan was 93,207; the proposed building footprint total t'br Lot 1 on the final plans is 95,430 square feet. This is approximately a 2,200 square foot increase in building square footage from the preliminary site plan. However, the proposed building coverage is still deficient of .5 ratio and has been addressed with the variance to floor area ratio approved by the Board of Adjustment on August 5, 2004. -. 'Setbacks: The proposed Town Center Zoning District has setback standards based on the principle of "build to" lines rather than traditional setbacks. This is especially important for the front'yard since it is typically where the building presentation relationship is to the street. The setbacks in the TC-2 District have been established as follows: Front; 0-15 feet, Side: 10 foot setback ~'rom building to building, 0 tbot setback from building to property, line, Rear 30 feet. The proposed comer retail building meets the front, side and rear setbacks. The Comer Retail Building also complies with Section 9.11.01, Sub& 7 of City, Code, regarding the vision clearance triangle at comer. Storm Water Plan. We offer the following comments: · The outlet structure for the pond shows a 2 fl orifice. This orifice is not reflected in the current storm water model. · The details include an emergency overflow using mff turf. This is not called out on the plans. Review of the grading plan shows that the lowest point.on the rim of the pond is at least 1 tbot above the floor elevation of the building closest to the pond. Please submit information on the maximum probable pond elevation. Assumptions should include partial or complete blockage of the outlet and should be clearly called out in the summary. · The [00 yr water elevation on the grading plans does not match the SWMM model. · inlet protection must be installed on all storm sewer structures as shown on the plans. · Storm water ponding is done in regional ponds for RTC. Each site must implement Best Management Practices for storm water quality. Please provide details on the BMP's for this site. Particular attention must be made to the storm lines draining the filling station element. Grading Plan: We offer the following comments on the grading plan. The italicized comments were issued in the July 2004 review and have not been addressed in the current plans. · -Fhe minimum allowable slope on bituminous surjbces mztst be 1.0%. The rninimz~m ,s'lo~oe on concrete szt~;/~es i~ 0.5% · .5~o~ elevations .yhould o'Rec~' top or bottom ofcztrb. · _¢~aximztm cross slope in &ire aisles sho~dd be 2.0% · Si,gne~t engineering drc~wirtgs will be need to be submirtect to the bzdi?:~g inspecEo~ cte/;arrment jbr review prior to approval of this concept.