11/04/04 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

28 Morion by Chai~ers©n N2xt? seconded by Commissioner Jeffrey, to recommend that the C:.ty Council ~an~ apprevai of fi~e proposed pre[i.minary pla~ confinsen~ upon compliance wkh City Stuff Review Le~er da~ed luly 30, 2004 and approval of ~he requesl for eke plan-approval. The preiirninasy pia~ should include ~he foiiowin~: Access to line up with :he !47~' Avenue,,~amsey Boulevard intersection east of Ramsey Boulevard. · The creaaon of an outiot adjacent to the southern lot to allow for t~ture co~ecdoa to the ~oad aetwork. · The minimum ertl-de-sac [en~th necessary as detennined by emit at the te~im of 148a Fu~her Discussion: Mr. Schmidt indicated the site will meet the setback and requirements. His plan is to eliminate fft*,ure issttes with the parcel on the comer by deeding the our[or to the City so it is there £'e.r acness pu~oses. Assistant Community Development Dtre~o. Trud~eon indicated staff wiii continue :o explore the access issue with ~e county. Commissioner Brauer asked if :he access bein~ proposed a~ 14? Avenue locks them in if the county decides h needs to be at a difikren~ location. Mr. Scb~midt replied he thins the countw will be hard pressed not to have the access where it already is. PuRins !48~ Avenue t~ou~h would create more pro6[ems with CR S6 and trafffic. Commissioner Brauer asked if somethins should be included in the motion to sta~e the Commission [s opposed ~o [48:l~ Avenue 8oin~ t~ough. Nk. Schmldt ~eplied if it [s included [n :he minutes he can communicate that to ~he county. Chairperson Nixt commented the recommendation of the Commission [s based on their desire to achieve the appropriate line- up ~iven :he existin~ deve[opmen~ aion~ CR S6 and to avoid the sza~ered access thai would result if the access were to be approved at 148~h Avenue, which they are opposed to a~ ~his time. This access a~ [alm Avenue would aisc facilitate the county's desire to eliminate additional access to CR ~6. Commissioner Watson stated access at 148a Avenue soins tbsou~h ~he r.esidentia[ neighborhood would be a violation of the comprehensive plan. There are several ~hin~s [n :he comprehensive plan ~'egardins ~he separation of new development ilom existin~ ' neishborhoods, the flow of traffic, and those types of things. There are aborn 20 diil~rent th~s in the compmlnensive plan tha~ the access at 148~ Avenue would be i'n violation. Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Nixt, Commissioners Jeffrey, Brauer, Van Scov and Watson. Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioners Johnson and Shepherd. Requesr for,,Sire Plan Review for Expansion of Wiser Choice Liquor Store; & W Holding, LLC ~~ Dir,.ctor Tmdgeon indicated' the City of aamsev nas' ~~f ~'[se .~f/[&W Holdin_ Com-oanv ~o construc~ ~c~~he site olan is sroposin~ to add i.960 ~irio~a~e area. The buiidin~ . . . ..... ~ ~ ~ ~ time off the de,/e[opmet~t. TI~e eke [s 'now zoned 7C-2 ~own ten[er Commercial. The off'-s,..= [icuor were ~ermiued with d~e ot'evtous zomn~ and oermltte~ 'm the TC-2 Commercial Zonin~ Pianning Commission/Augus~ 5. 2904 Page 17 of 4t)