My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Planning Commission - 10/03/2002
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Planning Commission
>
2002
>
Minutes - Planning Commission - 10/03/2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 4:03:46 PM
Creation date
5/5/2003 3:14:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
10/03/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Community Development Director Frolik advised that the variance could be considered at the <br />November 7, 2002 Board of Adjustment meeting. She noted that the sketch plan could be <br />addressed this evening so the Council can consider final plat approval at their November 12, <br />2002 meeting. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Chairperson Nixt, to approve the sketch plan for <br />L.P. Keillor Addition and recommend that City Council approved the final plat contingent upon <br />compliance with the City Staff Review Letter dated September 26, 2002 and contingent upon <br />approval of a setback variance from the Rogers Lake Ordinary High Water Mark. <br /> <br />Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Nixt, Commissioners Johnson, Kociscak, and Reeve. <br />Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioners Brauer and Watson. <br /> <br />Case #6: <br /> <br />Request for Sketch Plan Review of Wildlife Sanctuary 4th {3rd)Addition; Case <br />of Oakwood Land Development, Inc. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Frolik stated the City received an application from Oakwood <br />Land Development for sketch plan review of a 47-1ot plat located west of T.H. #47 and north of <br />Alpine Drive N.W. The property is approximately 19 acres in size and consists of 2 existing <br />homesteads and additional property was acquired from the two existing homesteads to the east. <br />One of the two existing homesteads will remain on the property (Lot 14, Block 4); the other <br />existing homestead within the boundaries of the plat will be removed (Lot 2, Block 1); the two <br />homesteads east of the plat, from which property was acquired, will not be platted and <br />redeveloped. The property is currently zoned R-1 Residential and is located in the Metropolitan <br />Urban Service Area. The 2001 Comprehensive Plan designates this area for low-density single- <br />family residential development not to exceed a net density of 3 units per acre. The gross density <br />of the plat appears to be 2.5 units per acre. There are wetlands present on the property that will <br />need to be factored out and a net density will be determined at the time of preliminary plat <br />review. The sketch plan identifies proper extension of public streets throughout the plat. The <br />north/south street will terminate in a cul-de-sac that complies with the 600-foot length restriction. <br />It appears that the lots meet the minimum standard for lot area and lot width. The City does have <br />a Density Transition Ordinance in effect. No transitioning will be required to the north and east <br />because of similar or denser development (Wildlife Sanctuary 2nd and Sunflower Ridge). The <br />plat abuts 3 larger, rural lots on the west that are also zoned R-1 Residential, located within the <br />Metropolitan Urban Service Area and eligible for redevelopment at urban standards. The new <br />Density Transition Ordinance does not clearly state what the requirements would be, if any, in <br />situations where the adjacent property is in the MUSA, zoned the same as the developing parcel, <br />but currently consists of the larger, rural type lots. Staff requested discussion and direction from <br />the Planning Commission. <br /> <br />John Peterson, Oakwood Land Development, used a map to point out the three adjacent <br />properties to the west of the subject property. He advised that one is being used as a rental <br />property and he spoke with the tenant but not the fee owner. He spoke with the owner of the <br />five-acre parcel which has a home and the other property is owned by a man who has lived there <br /> <br />Planning Commission/October 3, 2002 <br /> Page 8 of 12 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.