Laserfiche WebLink
Record of Decision — Riverstone Addition Environmental Assessment Worksheet <br />11. Historic Resources. A search of the Minnesota Archaeological Inventory and Historic <br />Structures Inventory did not identify archaeological sites or historic structures known to exist in <br />the project vicinity. The project is not expected to affect historic resources. <br />12. Visual Resources. There are no scenic views or vistas on or adjacent to the project area. <br />Substantial effects on visual resources are not anticipated in conjunction with project <br />development. <br />13. Noise. A Noise Study predicted noise levels at 19 receptor locations. The modeled noise level at <br />one of the receptor locations exceeded Minnesota NAC-1 noise standards for daytime hours <br />(Appendix B). The noise study lists potential remedies for this situation. <br />14. Transportation. The traffic to be generated by the proposed project does not raise capacity or <br />safety concerns. Traffic generated by the project will have little effect on the regional <br />transportation system. Intersections surrounding the site will continue to operate at acceptable <br />levels of service with the addition of traffic generated by the proposed project. The Updated <br />Traffic Study for the project is included in Appendix C. <br />B. Cumulative Potential Effects <br />Minnesota Rules 4410.1700 Subp. 7 (B) indicates the second factor the City must consider is "whether <br />the cumulative potential effect is significant; whether the contribution from the project is significant <br />when viewed in connection with other contributions to the cumulative potential effect; the degree to <br />which the project complies with approved mitigation measures specifically designed to address the <br />cumulative potential effect; and the efforts of the proposer to minimize the contributions from the <br />project." The City's findings are set forth below. <br />Projects typically combine to produce cumulative effects on municipal resources like water and <br />wastewater treatment. The City of Ramsey has planned for growth and increased capacity to address <br />these cumulative effects. The proposed project will implement approved mitigation measures and be <br />consistent with land use policies for areas served by municipal sewer and water. <br />Cumulative effects of suburban development on natural resources may include the loss of agricultural <br />land and the loss and fragmentation of wildlife habitat. Surface water runoff from the project area will <br />infiltrate into the soil or be treated in ponds prior to discharge to the Mississippi River. Stormwater <br />regulations administered by multiple agencies and water quality BMPs are expected to minimize <br />cumulative effects of post -development runoff on downstream waters. <br />C. Extent to Which the Environmental Effects are Subject to Mitigation <br />Minnesota Rules 4410.1700 Subp. 7 (C) indicates the third factor the City must consider is the "extent to <br />which the environmental effects are subject to mitigation by ongoing public regulatory authority." The <br />City's findings are set forth below. <br />Environmental effects on cover types, shorelands, floodplains, water quality, and traffic are subject to <br />additional approvals and/or mitigation through requirements of local, state, and federal regulations, <br />ordinances, management plans, and permitting processes. The following permits and approvals are <br />required for the project addressed under the EAW. These permitting and approval processes will provide <br />additional opportunity to require mitigation. <br />7 <br />