My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council - 02/12/2002
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council
>
2002
>
Minutes - Council - 02/12/2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 11:18:02 AM
Creation date
5/6/2003 10:45:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
02/12/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Further discussion: Councilmember Zimmerman did not feel that the traffic concerns had been <br />addressed. He stated that the developer may have agreed to reduce two lots along the pond, but <br />those lots probably should have not been included to begin with. He also felt that the <br />"doghouse" lot would continue to be an eyesore in the neighborhood. Councilmember <br />Hendriksen stated that the fact that the development is not as bad as it could have been only <br />means that the Comprehensive Plan is not as good as it should have been. He inquired if the <br />motion addressed the withdraw of the apartment complex and the creation of that lot as an outlot. <br />City Attorney Goodrich inquired if the preliminary plat included the apartment building. <br />Principal Planner Trudgeon replied that preliminary plat only creates the lots. Mr. Black noted <br />that he was not going to be requesting site plan approval on the apartment lot at this time. <br />Councilmember Anderson inquired at what time would it be appropriate to draft the reforestation <br />agreement. City Attorney Goodrich replied that reforestation should be addressed in the <br />development agreement. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilmembers Kurak, and Anderson. Voting <br />No: Hendriksen and Zimmerman. <br /> <br />Case #3: <br /> <br />Request for Site Plan Review for Townhomes located within The Ponds <br />Subdivision; Case of Royal Oaks Realty <br /> <br />Principal Planner Trudgeon stated that Royal Oaks Realty, Inc. has applied for site plan review <br />for a townhome development to be located within The Ponds subdivision. The applicant is <br />planning on constructing 91 townhome units. The townhouse development is generally located <br />along CSAH 5 (Nowthen Blvd.) northwest of the City Water Tower. The applicant has <br />submitted an application for the rezoning of the development property from B-1, Business and R- <br />1, Single-Family Residential to R-1 Single Family Residential, R-3U, Multi-Family Residential, <br />and MR, Multifamily Residential. The rezoning would allow the property to be subdivided into <br />88 single-family lots, 91 townhome units and 82 apartment units. The townhome development <br />will be constructed in an area that is roughly 16.57 acres in size. The net density of the <br />townhomes is proposed to be 6.88 units per acre. The area proposed to be developed as <br />townhomes lies within areas designated as medium and high density residential on the 2001 <br />Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. The drives serving the townhomes are a combination of <br />private and public roads. The public roads will consist of 144th Lane, 144th Court and Iodine <br />Street. The applicant is dedicating 60 feet of right-of-way for the public streets through the <br />townhouse portions of the development. The remaining townhouse units will be served by <br />driveways coming off the public roads. As the City Council knows, the City has been reviewing <br />use of private roads in multi-family developments. This plan complies with the policies the City <br />Council previously discussed. One of the considerations that the policy gave for the use of <br />public roads through townhouse developments was a reduced setback for those townhome units <br />located on public streets. The townhouse units along public streets will be set back 25 feet from <br />the right-of-way (approximately 40 feet from back of street curb) and the units located on the <br />private streets will be located 25 feet from back of street curb. All of the units will have <br />driveways 25 feet in length. Staff has reviewed the proposed setbacks for the townhouse units <br />and found them acceptable. The closest townhome unit is about 50 feet from the rear lot line of <br /> <br />City Council/February 12, 2002 <br /> Page 24 of 33 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.