Laserfiche WebLink
In 1992, M~en Mr. McDonald subdivided hig land into the exigfing two home,tea&, gtaffmade a <br />recommendation for a shared access onto Variolite Street. Following previous and current <br />practice to limit the number of accesses onto Variolite Street, staff is recommending that the two <br />newly created lots also share an access onto Variolite Street. Staff is also recommending that the <br />driveways for the newly created lots be aligned on the lots in a manner that will allow for future <br />subdivision, and ultimately accesses onto Variolite can be eliminated and converted to an interior <br />road. The plat is retaining a 66-foot drainage and utility easement through the plat in an <br />east/west direction. The easement is intended to preserve a corridor for a future road that is <br />designated in the comprehensive plan to facilitate the future extension of 167th Avenue to <br />Armstrong Boulevard. At their September 10, 2001 meeting, the Planning Commission <br />reviewed the proposed subdivision and recommended that the applicant proceed to final plat <br />stage. During the Staff review of the final plat of McDonald 2~'d Addition, the applicant was <br />notified that the City has an unwritten policy that requires alt wetlands to be encumbered by a <br />drainage and utility easement. Mr. McDonald made the decision not to continue with the <br />proposed plat at that time. The City Council reviewed Mr. McDonald's request to withdraw his <br />application for final plat approval on October 9, 2001. During the meeting the City Council <br />directed staff to review the current policy regarding encumbering wetlands and provide <br />alternatives. Mr. McDonald rescinded his request to withdraw his application and waived the 60 <br />day decision rule to allow time for the City Council and City Staff to review the current policy <br />and possibly look at other alternatives. The City Council adopted a policy on January 22, 2002, <br />stating that parcels outside of the MUSA Boundary that are ten acres in size or larger may be <br />exempt from dedicating a drainage and utility easement over the wetlands located on a subject <br />parcel. The City Engineer has reviewed the proposed McDonald 2'~a Addition final plat. It <br />would appear that the proposed McDonald 2"d Addition meets the requirements established in the <br />newly adopted policy on encumbering wetlands. Mr. McDonald is dedicating the required <br />drainage and utility easements on three parcels that are less than 10 acres in size and dedicating a <br />66-foot drainage and utility easement for the drainage ditch that generally runs in a north-south <br />direction located on Lot 4, Block 1. Mr. McDonald and Mr. Makowsky have written the <br />attached letter stating that a drainage swale will be dug to direct the runoff to the drainage ditch <br />that is protected by the 66-foot wide drainage and utility easement that runs north-south on the <br />subject property. City Staff and the Planning Commission recommended approval of the final <br />plat of McDonald Second Addition. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen requested that the area being identified for utility and drainage <br />easement be indicated on a map and kept on record. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Kurak, seconded by Councilmember Anderson, to adopt Resolution <br />#02-02-042 granting final plat approval to McDonald Second Addition contingent upon <br />compliance with the City staff review letter dated September 20, 2001, revised February 8, 2002, <br />and the developers entering into a development agreement with the City. <br /> <br />Further discussion: City Engineer Olson reviewed the drainage easements on the site. He <br />explained that staff did discuss the possibility of digging an additional swale, but did not feel that <br /> <br />City Council/February 12, 2002 <br /> Page 26 of 33 <br /> <br /> <br />