My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Comp Plan 1974-1977 FILE #1
>
Comprehensive Plan
>
Comprehensive Plan (old)
>
1970-1979
>
Comp Plan 1974-1977 FILE #1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2018 9:33:25 AM
Creation date
12/7/2004 2:45:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Engineering
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
326
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
- 18- <br /> <br />Maintenance and inspection of existing systems <br />throughout the entire City should be required and <br />enforced. <br /> <br />After Ramsey has taken these steps, the Metropolitan <br />Council and MWCC can evaluate whether an extension <br />of the Anoka interceptor to Ramsey at TH 47 is needed, <br />and if so, when it should be constructed. Appropriate <br />action can be taken through the Waste Management <br />Policy Plan,. Development Program, and Capital - ,..,., <br />Budgets. <br /> <br />III. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS <br /> <br />Ramsey'J proposed plan amendment consists of an "Urban Planning · <br />District Report." The amendment is not a complete comprehensive plan <br />but does establish very basic development policies for the City which <br />have been reviewed only for adequacy.and consistency with:the Metro-'"'~'-"~;. <br />poli. tan Development Framework policies and Metropolitan System Plans. <br /> <br />Metropolitan Council review of this proposed amendment will not <br />exempt the City of Ramsey from responsibilities ~stablished by the <br />Metropolitan Land Planning Act. . . ...~:, ... ',': ~:,. <br /> <br />Ramsey's plan concept, of delineating,an Urban Service Area, <br />Transition Area, and Rural Area Within the City is generally <br />consistent with the Development Framework, but/.he specific <br />application of this concept, as proposed, is inadequate and <br />not altogether consistent with the Development Framework. <br /> <br />be <br /> <br />Ramsey has not evaluated the service needs of current <br />residents, most of whom reside outside the proposed . <br />Urban Service Area. The City should consider whether <br />the future Urban Service Area should be defined as the center of. <br />the 'City where much. of the present development exists rather <br />than in the southern, more undeveloped part of the City. <br /> <br />The City's Urban Service Area is proposed in the pIan to <br />be open to urban development immediate.ly. This would <br />be premature because it is prior to the planned expansion <br />of the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (1981-90) and the <br />planned availability of metropolitan sewer service (1981 <br />at the earliest). <br /> <br />The City's proposed Urban Service Area would incorporate <br />more than twice as much developable land area as is <br />planned in the Development Framework. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.