Laserfiche WebLink
06-241 and a related extension to September 30, 2003, to complete the concrete screening wall as <br />described in said conditional use permit. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilmembers Zimmerman, Kurak, Anderson, <br />and Hendriksen. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Case#Il: Introduce Ordinance to Establish Regulations for the Operation of <br /> Helicopters within the City Limits <br /> <br />Community Development Director Frolik stated this case was put together in response to recent <br />incidents relating to helicopter takeoffs and landings in a residential neighborhood. Staff has <br />consulted with the MnDOT Office of Aeronautics to gain some insight into this type of activity <br />and how it can be regulated. MnDOT issues three types of heliport licenses: 1) personal use, <br />restricted to use by one person; 2) private use, which is for use by multiple persons at the <br />invitation of the owner (example would be the heliport at a hospital); and 3) public use, which <br />is unrestricted and open to the public. Current legislation says that the MnDOT Office of <br />Aeronautics can no longer require licensing of personal use airfields unless they are within five <br />miles of an airport. If they are outside the five mile radius, the applicant can request that the <br />personal use airfield be licensed by the MnDOT Office of Aeronautics. One of MnDOT's <br />requirements for licensing personal or private use airfields is that the applicant conform to the <br />Federal Aviation Regulations requiring the owner to file a notice of intent to establish a landing <br />area with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). In response to the notice, the FAA does <br />an airspace evaluation and responds by either objecting or not objecting to that use of the <br />airspace. However, FAA is not a licensing agency and even if they determine that the use of the <br />airspace and landing area is unsafe, they cannot prohibit someone from utilizing that landing <br />area. However, MnDOT, the licensing agency, can refuse a license application and typically <br />does if there is a negative determination from the FAA. In addition, MnDOT's decision to issue <br />a license is based on the safety concerns and they do not take noise into consideration. If the <br />City wants noise to be a consideration, then the City would have to require its own permit and <br />identify noise as a factor to be considered. The City doesn't have the expertise on staff and <br />would have to seek outside assistance to properly review the application. City Code would also <br />have to define and establish acceptable noise levels. Based on the information staff received, <br />staff recommended attempting to regulate helicopter activity only at this time. Staff <br />recommended that the Council introduce the proposed ordinance to require that heliports within <br />the City limits be licensed by the MnDOT Office of Aeronautics. If the City Council was <br />inclined to go a step further and require a special permit from the City for heliports so that noise <br />levels can be a part of the consideration, another ordinance was drafted for Council <br />consideration. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec inquired if the City can prohibit helicopters or not. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Frolik replied that it would not be advisable to restrict all <br />helicopters, but they can place restrictions on the use. She stated that the City could require a <br />special permit, but would have to seek outside expertise to consider the application. <br /> <br />City Council/May 14, 2002 <br />Page 27 of 36 <br /> <br /> <br />