My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council Work Session - 05/21/2002
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council Work Session
>
2002
>
Minutes - Council Work Session - 05/21/2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 12:02:37 PM
Creation date
5/6/2003 11:49:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Date
05/21/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3) Development Policy <br /> <br />City Administrator Norman stated that thc Council had requested more discussion regarding an <br />alternative development policy where the City would hire a consultant to perform the design of <br />the project, which had been recommended by staff. He also noted that staff has determined that <br />the Davis Bacon would not apply unless there were state monies involved in the project. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen inquired if MSA funding is considered state funds. <br /> <br />Principal Engineer Olson replied yes. <br /> <br />Councihnember Hendriksen stated that a comment was made at the last work session that the <br />Andover Development Policy was not working well and significant changes had been made, but <br />since that meeting, he had an opportunity to speak with Mr. Jacobsen from the Andover City <br />Council as well as the Andover City Clerk who did not feel that there were any major flaws with <br />the policy or any major changes were made, but they were allowing for some latitude with <br />developers that could not move forward with a project. <br /> <br />City Administrator Norman presented a memo from the Community Development Director <br />regarding the Andover Development Policy. <br /> <br />Councilmember Zimmerman inquired if a certain developer ran into financial problems and <br />could not proceed with a development would they move on to the next developer. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen replied that they would move to the next developer if there was any <br />reason a developer could not proceed with the project. He felt that the policy set proper <br />expectations with the developers. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec stated that the difficulty is determining what is an appropriate timeline. He felt <br />that the current way they handle development is a good policy. <br /> <br />Councilmember Zimmerman stated the issue is, does the City take in 23 plats in one year or do <br />they limit it to 12 or 15. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec replied that he feels the City has done a good job with handling the increased <br />development. He stated that the one reason for the rush of development in the City is because <br />there was a moratorium on most of the land for such a long time. <br /> <br />City Engineer Olson explained that the way things currently work is the developer hires their <br />own engineering firm, who has the developer's interest at heart. It puts the City on the spot to <br />catch as many errors as they can to consider the City as a whole. The suggested alternative was <br />that once preliminary plat is approved, the design is submitted to the City, the City would then <br />hire a consultant to do the public improvements. <br /> <br />Councihnember Kurak inquired if the consultant costs' would be paid for by the developer. <br /> <br />Principal Engineer Olson replied yes. <br /> <br />City Council/May 21, 2002 <br /> Page 4 of 8 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.