Laserfiche WebLink
Steve Schmidt, applicant, stated he does not have any problems .or suggestions. He would like to <br />point out the facility has been referred t° aS mini storage, however, some of the buildings will be <br />capable of holding Class A RV's and boats. This will not be the typical stOrage facility. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Elvig, secOnded by Councilmember Pearson, to adopt Resolution <br />#04-11-336 to grant preliminary plat approVal of Regency Pond 4th Addition contingent upon <br />compliance with the City Staff Review Letter dated July 30, 2004, revised. October 7, 2004, <br />revised November 4, 2004. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilmembers Elvig, pearson, CoOk, Kurak, and <br />Strommen. Voting No: None. Absent: CouncilmemberZimmerrnan. <br /> <br />Case #5: <br /> <br />Request for Site Plan Review of CNP Storage; Case of TSM Development, <br />Inc. ' <br /> <br />Associate Planner Geisler indicated the site plan submitted by TSM Development proposes to <br />construct a 19,440-, 15,200-, 10,200-, and a 15,600-square-foot storage building on Outlot A of <br />Regency Pond. The proposed development.' is located in the E-I' Employment District; mini- <br />storage facilities are a permitted Use in this district. The Board of AdjUstment heard the two <br />variance cases last week, one for the bufferyard width requirements and one for the setback <br />requirement to the cul-de-sac On 148th Avenue NW. The Board made the recommendation that <br />the fence be moved in to accommodate trees on the outside of the fence. Staff also recommends <br />a few additional shrubs on the RamseY Boulevard frontage,, and in addition to moving in the <br />fence, including several trees on the eastern: side of the site plan. The Planning' Commission <br />recommended approval at the July 12t" meeting. Staff is recommending approval of the site plan <br />in compliance with the CitY Staff Review Letterl <br /> <br />Councilmember Strommen asked if the recOmmendation of the Plannihg Commission was to <br />include some taller trees on the inside of the fence, and some other plantings on the outside of the <br />fence. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Geisler explained the Planning Commission was referring to moving the trees <br />on the north to the outside of the fence. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Pearson, seconded by Councilmember Cook, to grant approval of the <br />proposed site plan contingent upon compliance with City Staff'Review Letter dated June 25, <br />2004, revised July 9, 2004, revised' October 7, 2004, revised November 4, 2004, and approval of <br />the request for preliminary plat. ~ <br /> <br />Motion carried, Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilmembers Pearson, Cook, Elvig, Kurak, and <br />Strommen. Voting No: None. Absent: CouncilmemberZimmerman. <br /> <br />City CoUncil/November 9, 2004 <br /> Page 17 of 31 <br /> <br />P37 <br /> <br /> <br />