Laserfiche WebLink
The Landscape Plan has been revieWed and meets or exceeds the City's requireme,nts. Staff has <br />made some suggestions for diversity in species and trees that are more tolerant of de-icing salt. <br />The site plan for the Pond Building g~nerally conforms to the Town Center Development <br />Guidelines. There are no public parks idd~ntified for this sub-district and small group sitting areas <br />and a mixture of plantings and.pavement ~are encouraged. The west side of the building includes <br />an outdoor dining area that overlooks thc landscaped pond. The selected architectural materials <br />include brick, EIFS, split face CMU integrally treated with color, and metal aCcents. Staff is <br />requesting a sample of the corrugated metal panel material noted on the building elevations. The <br />guidelines recommend that 35°A of ground level street front facades be glass openings. The <br />building does not front on a street but theiamoUnt of glazing on the north wall facing the parking <br />lot is 18%. The reduction in glazihg is!acceptable as restaurants are not the typical window <br />shopping experience the City is striving for With the retail buildings. The building material <br />calculations indicate that 44% of the non-glazed area is brick and/or a comparable material. <br /> <br />At the December 2na Planning Commission, the City Staff and Planning Commissioners <br />reviewed the preliminary site plan. The discUssion focused on concerns with the design of the <br />drive-thru feature on the Pond Building, in~ cOmbination with the drive-thru pharmacy feature on <br />the Coborn's building, resulting in conflicting traffic patterns and flow through this westerly <br />parking lot. Specifically, the following isSUes were raised: <br /> <br /> a) the length of the drive-thru lane may be inadequate depending on the tenant; <br /> b) the traffic conflicts that co~d arise from the entrance to the drive thru lane being <br /> so close to the entrance to the parking lot; <br /> c) orderly traffic patterns ~with two drive-thru's in the same area (Pond Building and <br /> Coborn's Pharmacy); <br /> d) impact on traffic flow to both drive-thru's if Coborn's expands as anticipated; <br /> e) continued compliance With off-street parking requirements for the multiple uses <br /> on Lots 1 and 2 as parking spaces would have to be removed to still accommodate <br /> 2 drive-thrus if Cobornr's expansion occurs at some point in the future. <br /> <br />Subsequent to the Planning CommisSion meeting, Ramdance submitted revised plans for site <br />layout, grading, and future site layout dated December 7, 2004. These plan revisions were <br />reviewed by City Council on December 114 as part Of the request for preliminary site plan <br />approval. The drive-thru for the pond Buil~dirtg was lengthened to accommodate 4 rather than 3 <br />vehicles ~ <br /> <br />The tenant will be Caribou Coffee, which involves much less traffic than a fast food restaurant. <br />Caribou's standard is accommodating 4 vehicles: 2 at menu board, 1 at order board, 1 at pick-up <br />window. The lengthening of the drive-thru lane required loss of one parking space and revised <br />grading plan. <br /> <br />In addition, the curbed parking node adjacent to the drive-thru lane was redesigned to make it <br />virtually impossible to negotiate a right-in', turn into the drive lane and thereby decrease the <br />potential for traffic congestion just south of the entrance into the parking lot. The plan is to also <br />utilize parking lot directional signs to direct users of the Caribou drive-thru to the south end of <br />the parking lot and then north again to the;entrance to the drive-thru. Users of the pharmacy <br />drive-thru enter the parking lot and immediately head east and south through the drive-up <br />window. <br /> <br /> <br />