My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council - 08/13/2002
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council
>
2002
>
Minutes - Council - 08/13/2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 12:07:28 PM
Creation date
5/6/2003 1:12:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
08/13/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
suggested the possibility of some of the funds that were to be used for acquisition of'the property <br />be allocated to restore the property when the term of the lease ends. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen replied that those funds would be used to pay for the ten-year lease <br />on the property. He is concerned that they negotiate up front the final disposition of the <br />improvements at the end of the lease. They need to know up front if they are going to have to <br />include the removal of the facility. <br /> <br />Mr. Feges replied that he would expect that the improvement would be removed and brought <br />back to its previous state if the program fails. If the property owner asks that the facility be <br />removed, then it should be the property owner's responsibility to restore the property. He stated <br />that if they need to enter into language that if they choose the early opt out option that they <br />would be responsible for removal of the facility, he would not have a problem with that. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen inquired as to what would happen if the lease goes to its full term. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec replied that at that point it would probably mean the project has been a success <br />and they would probably negotiate another contract. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich stated that the question is who would be responsible to remove the <br />facility if the lease goes for the full term. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen stated that they should ask that the City not be responsible at all <br />initially. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec replied that they need to get the process moving forward. <br /> <br />Councilmember Anderson stated that if someone wants to do something on the property it would <br />be an incentive for them to do something with the facility. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kurak inquired as to what changes should be included in the agreement. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich replied that the lease agreement should be amended so that the City is <br />under no obligation to remove the facility if the opt out is invoked by the lessor. If the lessees <br />opts out then the City will be responsible. If the lease goes full term, negotiate removal of the <br />facility. There will be no expectation of cash or in-kind if they chose to opt out and rebuild a <br />similar facility, they would accept the maintenance of the facility if they opt-out. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Kurak, seconded by Councilmember Hendriksen, to authorize a lease <br />agreement between the City and BMA Associates for property lease by NORTHSTAR <br />COMMUTER COACH Park and Ride facility, which lease is to be amended per the terms <br />directed this evening and further authorizing the City Attorney to make the amendments to the <br />lease consistent with the Council direction, the lease not to be entered into unless the City has <br /> <br />City Council/August 13, 2002 <br /> Page 15 of 25 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.