My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 01/04/2018
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2018
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 01/04/2018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 10:29:58 AM
Creation date
1/25/2018 9:11:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
01/04/2018
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
231
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Zoning Bulletin December 25, 2017 I Volume 11 I Issue 24 <br />icate of occupancy —which did not occur here when the previous CUP expired. <br />Substantial evidence showed that, upon expiration of the previous CUP, the <br />occupancy was not converted from B occupancy (commercial) back to R3 <br />(residential); the occupancy was and remained "B." <br />Third, the court rejected Harrington's claims that the CUP contemplated <br />alterations to the Property that triggered the Building Code's accessible park- <br />ing requirements, finding that Harrington had waived that argument by failing <br />to raise it at the administrative level and exhaust his administrative remedies. <br />Fourth, addressing Harrington's claims that the City Council failed to make <br />sufficient findings to support the conclusion that compliance with accessible <br />parking requirements would be technically infeasible, the court found that the <br />City Council properly made no technical infeasibility findings with regard to <br />parking at the Property because "there was no attempt to rely on the technical <br />infeasibility exemption," in light of the determination that accessible parking <br />was not required. <br />Finally, the court concluded that, contrary to Harrington's claims, the CUP <br />did not conflict with the City Municipal Code's required protection of the <br />"residential character" of an R-3 district because the City Council had found <br />that LeBlanc's proposed professional office use was "of the same general <br />character as the other conditional and general permitted uses within the [R- <br />3-M zoning district]." <br />Zoning News from Around the <br />Nation <br />MARYLAND <br />The Prince George's County Council has approved zoning to allow a <br />marijuana dispensary to operate in the county, "permitting it to open 300 feet <br />or farther from residential properties and at least 500 feet from schools, day <br />care centers and parks." <br />Source: The Washington Informer; http://washingtoninformer.com <br />OHIO <br />The Cleveland Council recently adopted zoning legislation "that allows <br />state -licensed medical marijuana cultivators, processors, retail dispensaries <br />and testing laboratories to operate in certain zones in the city." Reportedly, the <br />city legislation includes state restrictions such as limiting operations' proximi- <br />ties to within 500 feet of schools, parks, churches, and libraries. <br />Source: News 5 Cleveland; wwwnews5cleveland.com <br />WISCONSIN <br />State legislatures passed a property rights bill —the "Homeowners Bill of <br />Rights" —which was headed to Governor Scott Walker's desk for signature. <br />The bill reportedly is a response to the United States Supreme Court decision <br />© 2017 Thomson Reuters 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.