My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council - 09/11/2002
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council
>
2002
>
Minutes - Council - 09/11/2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 12:08:33 PM
Creation date
5/6/2003 1:17:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
09/11/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
pumps. Staff indicated that the site plan approval should be contingent upon the applicant <br />providing an ingress/egress easement in recordable form between the owners of Lot 1 and Lot 2 <br />of Sunfish Commons, and upon compliance with City Staff Review Letter dated September 6, <br />2002. <br /> <br />Councihnember Kurak stated that she was very concerned about the traffic generation within the <br />site. She inquired as to how she could get more information on the traffic study before moving <br />forward. She recommended tabling action for further review. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich noted that the ordinance states that the Council shall review and approve <br />the site plan or adopt findings of fact to deny the application. The Council could table action and <br />direct staff.' to develop findings of fact in the positive or negative. <br /> <br />Councihnember Kurak inquired if that would be the appropriate motion for her to make. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich replied yes. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kurak inquired as to how much time staff would need to put the information <br />together. <br /> <br />City Engineer Olson inquired if Councilmember Kurak was concerned about turning conflicts. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kurak replied that she would like to know how all of the traffic flows through <br />the entire development. <br /> <br />City Engineer Olson explained that staff could inform the Council on which way traffic will <br />move. If Council wants a traffic generation analysis of the site it would take about four weeks. <br /> <br />Councilmember Zimmerman inquired if the City had received comment from the State Highway <br />Department. <br /> <br />City Engineer Olson replied that they had received comment as it relates to the entire Sunfish <br />Commons development. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich inquired where they were in regards to the 60-day rule. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Frolik replied that they would need to impose the 60-day <br />extension. The Council has until October 30, 2002, to make a decision. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen inquired if the development will be creating any new access points. <br />Mayor Gamec replied no. <br /> <br />City Council/September 11, 2002 <br /> Page 22 of 31 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.