My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council Work Session - 09/24/2002
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council Work Session
>
2002
>
Minutes - Council Work Session - 09/24/2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 12:09:46 PM
Creation date
5/6/2003 2:10:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Date
09/24/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
might approve the comprehensive plan amendment only if certain terms are met. That is where <br />the City will be the most vulnerable because what they would be adopting is not consistent with <br />the idea ora broad plan of the comprehensive plan. <br /> <br />Councilmember Anderson inquired if they have a choice if they want to make the conditional <br />zoning work because the zoning has to comply with the comprehensive plan. <br /> <br />Councihnember Hendriksen inquired if they were to have a land use and within the land use <br />there are four or five potential zoning districts, would the developer be entitled to any of the five <br />zonings they choose. <br /> <br />Principal Planner Trudgeon replied that generally that was true. He explained that typically <br />within a land use designation there are certain zonings permitted and to change to a permitted <br />zoning would not require a comprehensive plan amendment.. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich stated that as long as the zoning is consistent with the comprehensive <br />plan the Council could make the decision as to which zoning would be permitted on a piece of <br />property. <br /> <br />Principal Planner Trudgeon agreed with that. <br /> <br />Councilmember Anderson inquired as to how they could have a B-I, B~2, and B-3 zoning which <br />is not specific and R-l, R-2, and R-3, which is very specific. She stated that they were not being <br />consistent. <br /> <br />Councihnember Hendriksen inquired if they are consistent with the comprehensive plan. <br /> <br />Principal Planner Trudgeon explained that in the comprehensive plan there are land use <br />designations such as places to work, places to shop, low density, medium density, and high <br />density, rural preserve etc. Just because it says places to shop does not mean that they get the <br />highest use of the land and as long as they back up their reasons they would be on solid ground. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich stated that the land use designation, places to work, has two zonings and <br />the Council could chose either one of the zonings and then within one of the two zones they <br />would narrow it down again to a specific use through a contract, if the Council adopts the <br />proposed ordinance. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kurak stated that in the comp plan they have low, medium and high <br />designations and if someone wanted to change from low density to high density that would <br />require a comprehensive plan amendment. <br /> <br />Principal Planner Trudgeon replied that that was correct. <br /> <br />City Council/September 24, 2002 <br /> Page 4 of 6 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.