Laserfiche WebLink
setbacks. All structures must be set back 30 feet from the exterior boundary line. It appears that <br />all of the townhouse units meet this requirement. Under the R-2 District, townhouses must be set <br />back 25 feet from the public right-of-way and 25 feet from the edge of curb of the private street. <br />It appears that all townhouse units meet the set back from the public and private streets. The <br />single~family lots meet all of the dimensional requirements required by City Ordinances. City <br />Ordinances require townhome developments to be served with public streets and driveway <br />collectors that are private streets. Under City Ordinances, the allowable length of the private <br />streets are determined by the type of turnaround provided. The private streets shown appear to <br />meet the private street standards. The applicant is proposing to provide public roads to access <br />Alpine Drive and Sunfish Lake Boulevard. (CSAH 56). The access on Sunfish Lake Boulevard. <br />will need Anoka County approval. The preliminary plat shows public road accesses that will <br />serve properties to the north, east, and west. At the Planning Commission meeting on September <br />5, 2002, the Planning Commission directed the applicant to not construct the stub roads to the <br />east and west. The stub road going to the west will be preserved as an outlot and the alignment <br />for the stub road to the east will be incorporated into the larger outlot. Under City Ordinances, <br />townhome developments shall have a minimum of 40% of the development property as open <br />space for the enjoyment of its residents. The preliminary plat meets this standard. Of the 40% <br />open space, 10% of the open space is required to be grouped together in a way that is easily <br />identifiable and used as common space. In the sketch plan, the developer indicated that in a <br />future phase, they will be constructing a community building that will serve the residents of this <br />development. The City will count this as meeting the 10% common space requirement. <br />However, if the community building is not built, the developer will be responsible for creating <br />the required common space in future phases. The developer has submitted a tree protection plan. <br />Currently the City has no ordinances governing tree preservation. However, a task force has <br />been set up to prepare an ordinance governing tree preservation. The Planning Commission <br />reviewed the tree protection plan at their September 5, 2002 meeting, and found it to be generally <br />acceptable. The City of Ramsey has recently adopted a density transition ordinance that will take <br />effect on September 30, 2002. As part of the site plan submittal, the applicant has provided the <br />City with information on how the western property lines would have landscape buffering in <br />accordance with the new ordinance. The applicant is, for the most part, meeting the buffering <br />requirement when a R-2 use is adjacent to a R-1 urban single-family use (the lots to the west are <br />within the MUSA). The applicant is showing a minimum of 35 feet of space in common <br />ownership (the buffering required under the ordinance is 25 feet). The ordinance calls for 20 <br />under story, 20 evergreen, and 20 over story trees along the western perimeter of the plat. The <br />applicant is showing 20 under story and over story trees and 19 evergreen trees. Where the <br />proposed single-family lots abut the existing single-family lots, the applicant is showing some <br />screening even though the ordinance does not require it. The applicant is also showing the <br />installation of landscape buffering between the new single-family lots and the two unit <br />townhomes. The project is also subject to the review and permitting process of the Lower Rum <br />River Watershed Management Organization (WMO) and MPCA. Comments regarding the <br />drainage, grading, and utility plans are contained in the staff review letter. Park dedication and <br />trail issues will be discussed at a future Park Commission meeting. The Planning Commission <br />conducted the preliminary plat public hearing on August 29, 2002. The Commission closed the <br />public hearing and tabled action on the request for preliminary plat approval until the regular <br /> <br />City Council/September 24, 2002 <br /> Page 20 of 33 <br /> <br /> <br />