Laserfiche WebLink
Observations/Alternatives: <br />Observations: <br />At the time this report was prepared, construction of this project was complete with only punch list item work <br />remaining and Staff was calculating final construction costs to assist in determining final assessment amounts for <br />use in publishing and mailing notices for the Assessment Hearing. Alternatives: <br />Alternative #1 — Adopt Resolution #19-217 ordering preparation of a final assessment roll and calling for an <br />Assessment Hearing at 7 p.m. on October 8, 2019 for Improvement Project #19-01, Ford Brook Estates Street <br />Reconstructions. <br />Alternative #2 — Deny adoption of Resolution #19-217 at this time. <br />Funding Source: <br />Project Costs <br />On May 14, 2019, the City Council accepted bids and awarded a construction contract to Asphalt Surface <br />Technologies (ASTECH) of Saint Cloud, Minnesota, per their low bid of $262,503.25. This bid included <br />$249,901.55 for the base bid, plus $12,601.70 for the alternate bid to expand the cul-de-sac so school buses could <br />pick students up in the cul-de-sac instead of on Highway 47. <br />Street reconstruction project costs include construction costs plus 23% indirect costs for administrative (6%), <br />engineering (15%), finance (1%), and legal (1%) costs. Upon adding 23% to construction costs, the contracted <br />project cost is $322,879.00. The engineer's project cost estimate based on final plans was $244,045.28. The <br />contracted project cost is $78,833.72, or 32.3 percent, higher than the engineer's project cost estimate. <br />When preparing engineer's estimates, Staff applies unit bid prices from projects most recently bid (within the last <br />year or two), and adjusts unit prices based on the latest available information pertaining to inflation. The intent is <br />for the engineer's estimate to fall within the middle of all bids received, which has been the norm in recent years. <br />Bids received this year were higher than the engineer's estimates. The unit bid prices that were significantly higher <br />on this project were for mobilization ($18,000), bituminous pavement ($12,867), and concrete work ($8,262). <br />Other cities also experienced higher bid prices this year, particularly on bituminous and concrete pay items. <br />Staff is working to finalize actual construction costs. Based on quantities known to date, final construction costs <br />will likely be equal to or slightly more than the contract amount. Final project costs will be reviewed in detail during <br />the Assessment Hearing. <br />These improvements were included in the City's Capital Improvement Plan for 2018 construction. Funding sources <br />include a combination of unexpended street reconstruction bond funds, special assessments to benefiting properties, <br />and stormwater utility funds. <br />Special Assessments <br />The City's Special Assessments Policy (attached) calls for special assessments to pay for up to 25% of eligible <br />street reconstruction improvement costs. Special assessments are calculated using methods resulting in reasonable <br />and equitable distribution of assessments that are uniform upon the same class of properties within the assessable <br />area. The test for determining the validity of a special assessment is whether the improvement for which the <br />assessment was levied has increased the market value of the property against which the assessment was levied in at <br />least the amount of the assessment. <br />Ramsey's Special Assessments Policy identifies three optional methods for calculating assessments; Adjusted Front <br />Footage, Area, and Per Lot. The Feasibility Report for this project identified 8 benefiting residential properties that <br />are proposed to be assessed up to 25-percent of eligible project costs. On all previous residential street <br />reconstruction projects, the Per Lot assessment method was applied so Staff recommends using the Per Lot method <br />for this project. <br />Eight (8) benefiting properties receive special benefit from the improvements and are proposed to be assessed up to <br />25-percent of eligible project costs. Eligible project costs include all costs except those related to subgrade <br />