My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Public Works Committee - 11/19/2002
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Public Works Committee
>
2000 - 2009
>
2002
>
Minutes - Public Works Committee - 11/19/2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 9:32:35 AM
Creation date
5/12/2003 2:20:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Public Works Committee
Document Date
11/19/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Further discussion: Mayor Gamec stated that his concern is if they take this action are they going <br />to have to go through this discussion with every priority street light. Councilmember <br />Zimmerman replied that most people probably don't care. Mr. Jagerson noted that there is also <br />an intersection on his property going into Traprock Park and he does not want to see a light there <br />in the future either, City Engineer Jankowski replied that that intersection is on the priority street <br />light schedule, but will not be done this year. Mayor Gamec inquired if it will even be possible <br />for Connexus to install the light this year with the delay. Mr. Offerman replied that they do have <br />winter charges going into affect, which would be the only difference. Mayor Gamec stated that <br />he would personally prefer to have the light installed, but if they do what is in the motion it will <br />take another 60 days so maybe should the delay it and look at it at a different time. He <br />recommended that they stop the p roj ect this y ear a nd m ove it u ntil n ext y ear. C ity E ngineer <br />Olson stated that Mr. Jagerson has stated that he does not want a light at the intersection going <br />into the park so how does staff address that issue. He questioned who does staff notify when <br />they do decide to install_ the light at 158"' and Variolite in the future. He expressed concern that <br />they might be setting precedent. Councilmember Kurak stated that she personally thinks that <br />asking residents their opinion is great, but when they are talking about priority lighting they are <br />walking down a slippery slope. She stated that if the light is not warranted at this time she would <br />prefer to place the light at a different intersection. City Engineer Jankowski stated that they can <br />place the intersection of 158th and Variolite as the last intersection to receive a light. <br />Councilmember Hendriksen stated that they have already set precedent in some extent to do what <br />the citizens want. <br />The motion was amended to remove the priority street light for the intersection of 158th and <br />Variolite at this time and address it at a later date, but noting that they should take into account <br />the wishes of the residents. <br />Further discussion: Mr. Jagerson inquired if he could be notified the next time the issue will be <br />discussed. Mayor Gamec replied that that is difficult for them to do. Councilmember <br />Hendriksen suggested that Mr. Jagerson let them know what the consensus is of the <br />neighborhood regarding the light. <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec and Councilmembers Hendriksen, Anderson, Kurak, <br />and Zimmerman. Voting No: None. <br />Mr. Jagerson stated that the light poles along Alpine Drive don't match and inquired if something <br />could be done so that they would match. Mr. Offerman replied that he would look into that. <br />Councilmember A nderson s tated t hat at t he i ntersection o f 1 56th Lane and T.H. 47 there is a <br />priority light and inquired as to how Connexus determines what angle the light should face. <br />Mr. Offerman reviewed how the lighting is determined for an intersection and how the policy has <br />changed over the years because photometrics have changed. <br />Public Works Committee/November 19, 2002 <br />Page 4 of 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.