My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Parks and Recreation Commission - 03/10/2005
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
2005
>
Minutes - Parks and Recreation Commission - 03/10/2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/28/2025 11:17:09 AM
Creation date
4/21/2005 7:15:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Parks and Recreation Commission
Document Date
03/10/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Case #1: Mississippi River Regional Trail <br /> <br />Parks/Utilities Supervisor Riverblood explained beginning in December 2004 and concluding <br />this pasl month, the Cities of Anoka and Ramsey partnered with Anoka County Park Department <br />lo prepare a f'casibility study to examine existing and proposed trail connections south of <br />Highways #10 and #169. <br /> <br />Mr. Nick Eloff, Planner for Anoka County Parks Department, noted the trail system is centered <br />around Kings Island which is the major hurdle because of the costs. He stated they hired <br />Hakanson Anderson to set the plan up. <br /> <br />Mr. I~;Io IT rcvicwed the trail plans with the Commission. <br /> <br />Parks/Utilities Supervisor Riverblood stated one thing that was omitted was a trail going over the <br />Hvcr with the new bridge and a separated pedestrian crossing. He would like this to be added to <br />the map. <br /> <br />Mr. [~;lolT stated on the CIP this is five to six years out. He thought this will be a good <br />opporttmity for the citizens of Ramsey. <br /> <br />Chairperson Johns thought the trail system looked like their plan. <br /> <br />Mr. l~loffnoted thc trail will need to be piece meeled in because it cannot be done all at once. <br /> <br />?arks/Utilities Supervisor Riverblood stated the feasibility study and routing plan sets the city <br />and county up for grants with other partners such as the National Park Service, MnDot, the Rail <br />Road, and perhaps private developers. He stated this is multi-jurisdictional and brings them up <br />higher on thc list of grant makers. <br /> <br />Chairperson Johns thought this plan was great and was a high priority of theirs. <br /> <br />Thc Commission concurred. <br /> <br />Parks/Utilities Supervisor Riverblood thought before this were approved, they have the final <br />changes done on the plans and then be brought back for review and approval. <br /> <br />Commissioner Ostrum thought they might want to clarify the bridge going over Highway 10 was <br />not part of'the p,'oposed plan for funding. <br /> <br />Parks/Utilities Supervisor Riverblood wondered if they could find out the costs for the crossing <br />over lbo river, if this could be estimated in the plans and marked as an estimated cost. <br /> <br />Mr. ElolT stated if they do a regional trail in the park, they will do a trail often feet. <br /> <br />Chairperson Johns asked when a trail is designated as regional, does the City maintain the trail. <br />She wondered how this worked. <br /> <br /> Park and Recreation Commission/March 10, 21)05 <br /> Page 3 of 11 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.