My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Parks and Recreation Commission - 03/10/2005
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
2005
>
Minutes - Parks and Recreation Commission - 03/10/2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/28/2025 11:17:09 AM
Creation date
4/21/2005 7:15:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Parks and Recreation Commission
Document Date
03/10/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Parks/Utilities Supervisor Riverblood stated at this point there are full trail easements along the <br />c~_sl part of thc plat, at which point the trail might cross to the north of Trott Brook. He stated it <br />was his understanding that the Community Development staff may be considering a need for a <br />~Ltm'c mad crossing dedication for this neighborhood. <br /> <br />Thc Commission discussed the trails within the development on the map. <br /> <br />Parks/Utilities Supervisor Riverblood thought more work needed to be on the trail alignment. <br /> <br />Commissioner Olds asked if this trail or any trail in the City have the potential of being placed in <br />a wet]and buffer zone. <br /> <br />f'arks/Utilitics Supervisor Riverblood stated they do not presently have a wetland buffer <br />ordinance. He thought the trail would be set outside of the wetland. <br /> <br />Commissioner Shryock stated when they go through conservation areas, what kind of guidelines <br />allows a City to build a boardwalk or bituminous trail when a homeowner cannot do anything. <br /> <br />l~arks/Utilitics Supervisor Riverblood stated he thought a boardwalk would be permitted to be <br />put in oven by a homeowner but they could not do any filling in of wetland. <br /> <br />Civil Engineer I! Linton stated the description of the easement stated that in order to access the <br />property, they would need a trail. <br /> <br />Case #5: Sketch Plan Review for Sweet Bay Ridge <br /> <br />Civil F, nginecr II Linton explained Oakwood Land Development has submitted sketch plans for <br />Sweet Bay Ridge, the former St. Anthony Gun Club Property. This project was submitted in <br />January with the note that it was tabled by the Planning Commission until the March 2005 <br />mccling. This development is in the Trott Brook Recreation District. This project will require a <br />comprehensive plan amendment. The Planning Commission case details the comprehensive plan <br />amendment process. <br /> <br />Chairperson Johns stated she would like to have staff put together information for the Trott <br />I3rook Recreation District to review for the next meeting to identify what park and green space is <br />available in this area. <br /> <br />Commissioner Shryock stated she was concerned they were trying to smash in density when they <br />do not have transportation or sewer and water in the area. She would like to see the <br />developments at a lower density. She thought with the densities being put in the area, the <br />developers may need to consider smaller tot lots around the developments. She noted they do not <br />have the transportation or utilities to meet the higher density being proposed in the new <br />developments. <br /> <br />Fire Chief Kapler stated Council went through a strategic planning session and as far as <br />recreation goes, they had a lengthy discussion that they focus on all age groups. They wanted to <br /> <br />Park and Recreation Commission/March 10, 2005 <br /> Page 7 of 11 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.