My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council - 12/11/2001
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council
>
2001
>
Minutes - Council - 12/11/2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 1:33:13 PM
Creation date
5/15/2003 8:41:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
12/11/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councihnember Hendriksen inquired if it was appropriate to introduce the ordinance even though <br />it is not a part of an approved Comprehensive Plan. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich replied yes. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Kurak, seconded by Councilmember Anderson, to introduce an <br />ordinance to rezone certain property in Section 14 from R-1 Rural Residential to R-1 Urban <br />Residential, based on the Findings of Fact, and contingent upon Metropolitan Council approving <br />the request for a Comprehensive Plan amendment to include the subject property in the MUSA. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilmembers Kurak, Anderson, Hendriksen, <br />and Zimmerman. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Case #5: <br /> <br />Request for Sketch Plan Review of River Pines 5th Addition; Case of <br />Oakwood Land Development, Inc. <br /> <br />Principal Planner Trudgeon stated that Oakwood Land Development has submitted an <br />application to the City for a subdivision to be named River Pines 5th Addition. The property is <br />located on the west side of T.H. #47, immediately north of the existing Apple Ridge/River Pines <br />neighborhood. The Planning Commission reviewed a sketch plan in September that proposed to <br />subdivide the property into 13 single-family, residential lots with urban services. During the <br />discussion at the September meeting, it was unclear whether the plat acreage included the <br />existing homestead to the east, and if it didn't, whether or not future public access to the east <br />should also be a consideration. The Planning Commission tabled approval of the sketch plan and <br />recommended that the Developer provide options for future public access to the north and verify <br />the status of the existing homestead to the east. The property is currently zoned R-1 Rural <br />Residential and, at the September meeting, the Planning Commission recommended that City <br />Council approve a rezoning to R-1 Urban Residential to facilitate development of the property <br />with municipal water and sanitary sewer. The Planning Commission also recommended that <br />City Council approve an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan to expand the Metropolitan <br />Urban Service Area boundary to include the subject property. The plat area is 9.7 acres. The <br />owner of the existing homestead adjacent to T.H. #47 is joining in the plat and the number of lots <br />have increased from 13 to 18. The gross density reflected in the sketch plan is 1.9 units per acre; <br />net density will be calculated at the time of preliminary plat approval. The lots would receive <br />public access from the extension of 158th Lane into the plat from River Pines 2nd Addition to the <br />west. Currently, 158th Lane dead ends on the west boundary of the proposed plat and this is a <br />public safety concern since the length of this dead end is greater than 600 feet. It is also <br />hindrance to snow removal and storage efforts. Lithium Street NW would be extended from the <br />south to the north boundary of the plat. A cul-de-sac would extend east off of Lithium to service <br />the remainder of the lots. The existing homestead will have access to the cul-de-sac. The plat <br />will be forwarded to Mn/DOT for review and it is expected that they will suggest that the two <br />existing driveways onto T.H. #47 from the existing homestead be abandoned and that right of <br />access along T.H. #47 be dedicated to the State. It appears that the cul-de-sac does not exceed <br />the 600-foot length restriction. All of the lots exceed the 10,800 square foot lot area and 80 foot <br /> <br />City Council/December 11, 2001 <br /> Page 18 of 25 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.