Agenda - Council - 07/26/2005 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

l;7na[ ~l'lat and Final 5'ire ?lan Review: Rarnsey Town Center 8th Addition 22, 2005 The rl 'C4-a Zoning District requires the following lot standards: Minimmn lot size Mill hnum lot width Minimum lot depth NoDe 20 feet 80 feet A11 propgscd lots meet these requirements. ~l'h.e proposed use of new outlet C should be coordinated with the Town Center Gardens plat to tile east. 4. Setbacks: The TC4-a Zoning District requires the following setbacks: Front yard Side yard Rear yard 0 to 20 feet as measured from building front to edge of sidewalk; None, unless required by building code; None, unless required by building code. On June 28, 2005 the City Council adopted se_luTe-revisions to the Town C~nter zoning district which will allow 20 foot driveways, in addition to changing the maximum front yard setback to 25 feet. The individual units will be required to meet the 25-foot maximum front yard setback; this will be verified on the individual building permits. Public Streets: The development project lies west of Town Center Drive and south of a new public street, shown as 147th Lane on the Final plat. This street is labeled as a 50-foot right- of-way with a pavement width of 32 feet. The portion of Town Center Drive north of Bunker Lake Blvd must comply with state aid standards. Additionally, this street is a Phase 2 - Segment 3 roadway improvement, and as such is not scheduled for construction until 2008. Bonding for this street improvement has not yet occurred. Construction of this street prior to this schedule will be the responsibility of the developer, unless a temporary alternative can be agreed on with the City. Ti~e proposed terminus of Town Center Drive at the east property line must be coordinated with the Town Center Gardens Development to the east, which has received preliminary plat approval. The extension of 147th Lane from the east property line to Town Center drive must also be coordinated with Town Center Gardens. Town Center Gardens has received prelilninary platt approval. From the plans submitted it appears that these streets are close to proper alignment between the two developments, but this will need to be verified with property scaled plans. The current grading plans for the two developments indicate that the portion of 147t~ Lane on this site would approach grades of 7%; this is the maximum allowable under City Code. Grades should be revised to produce a more desi~;able condition: Alignment and grade of 147th and general grading work must also be coordinated between these two developments.