My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 08/08/2005
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2005
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 08/08/2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 9:37:49 AM
Creation date
8/4/2005 11:20:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
08/08/2005
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
319
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ecological, what happens when animals ingest the shot, and not the same sort of deleterious <br />effect on young children as from other lead fallout. <br /> <br />Councilmember Strommen stated they are pursuing the certificate of completion and asked 'if <br />there would be issues if approval is considered contingent upon receipt of the certificate of <br />completion. <br /> <br />Mr. Peterson stated they think it is essential that they do have that certificate of completion prior <br />to conveying individual lots to individual homeowners. That is what they need. <br /> <br />Councilmember Strommen stated that is also her position, to have any consideration contingent <br />upon the certificate. She asked about the area where the paving company has been operating. <br /> <br />Mr. Otten stated they have taken shallow samples but not yet installed deeper monitoring. The <br />MPCA wants them to install ground water monitoring wells. <br /> <br />C(mncilmember Strommen asked if deeper borings would be conducted. <br /> <br />Mr. ()tten answered in the affirmative. <br /> <br />Councilmember Strommen asked if the Comprehensive Plan amendment is- going to be <br />considered first. <br /> <br />City Administrator Norman answered in the affirmative. <br /> <br />Councilmember Strommen stated her appreciation to Mr. Peterson for the way he worked with <br />the City and been accommodating. She also thanked her fellow colleagues noting a discussion <br />was held during a work session about drafting guidelines to bridge the current Comprehensive <br />Plan to the future Comprehensive Plan. She stated her appreciation for those steps and revisions <br />to the sewer and water hook up language. She stated she feels strongly about having a plan for <br />the sewer and water extension, which is a major plan. She stated it is important for assuring the <br />City remains in front of the development. Councilmember Strommen stated she understands Mr. <br />Peterson cannot be "put on hold" forever and Fall is a long time, but a plan is important and she <br />will vote no on the amendment. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Pearson, seconded by Councilmember Cook, to adopt Resolution <br />#05-03-084 Approving the Request and Authokizing Staff to Subm/.t the Comprehensive Plan <br />Amendment to Metropolitan Council. <br /> <br />l;urther discussion: Councilmember Jeffrey suggested the motion be contingent upon receipt of <br />the certificate of completion, City Administrator Norman stated the certificate of completion <br />would be addressed in the sketch plan consideration. <br /> <br />City Council / March 22, 2005 <br /> Page 20 of 38 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.