Laserfiche WebLink
4.0 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br />4.1 Proposed Construction <br />We understand the project will consist of constructing an approximate 270 lot residential <br />development including the associated streets underground utilities and stormwater ponds. <br />Specific architectural, structural or civil construction plans were not available at the time of <br />this geotechnical evaluation. We anticipate the new homes will include one or two stories <br />above grade with partial to full depth basements. We anticipate below grade construction <br />consisting of cast -in -place concrete or masonry block foundation walls supported on concrete <br />spread footings with the above grade construction likely consisting of wood framing, a <br />pitched roof and asphalt shingles. <br />Based on the assumed construction we estimate wall loadings will range from about 2 to 3 <br />kips (2,000 to 3,000 pounds) per lineal foot and column loads, if any will be less than 75 kips <br />(75,000 pounds). <br />We anticipate that the proposed house pads and street will be constructed near existing site <br />graded so that cuts and fills for permanent grade changes will typically be on the order of 5 <br />feet but given the relatively large elevation changes across the site we anticipate there could <br />be cuts and fills on the order of 10 feet. <br />We have attempted to describe our understanding of the project. If the proposed loads exceed <br />these values, the proposed grades differ by more than 2 feet from the assumed values or if the <br />design or location of the proposed building changes, we should be informed. Additional <br />analyses and revised recommendations may be necessary. <br />4.2 Discussion <br />Structures existed on north central portion of the project site which we assume will be <br />removed/demolished to make way for the proposed development. We recommend that all <br />remnants of the structures including; foundations, foundation walls, floor slabs and any <br />underground utilities be removed from within the proposed building, roadway, utility and <br />oversize areas and be properly disposed of off -site. <br />The vegetation and topsoil are not suitable for foundation support and will need to be <br />removed from below the building and oversize areas and replaced, as needed, with suitable <br />compacted engineered fill. <br />It is our opinion that the underlying native alluvial soils are generally suitable for foundation <br />support. However, the sand soils had a very loose to loose relative density and will need to be <br />compacted to increase their density to provide adequate foundation support. <br />In addition, some soft clayey soils were encountered in soil boring SB-10 at about 4 1/2 feet <br />below the ground surface and at about 12 feet below the ground surface at soil boring SB-12. <br />The soft clays are not suitable for foundation support and will need to be removed from below <br />the proposed house pad and oversize areas and will either need to be replaced with suitable <br />compacted engineered fill or excavated, dried and recompacted. <br />6 <br />