Laserfiche WebLink
Commission Input <br /> <br />Com~nissioner Van Scoy stated that it looks like the two entrances are very close, and there will <br />bc semi-truck traffic as well as a fair amount of residential traffic. He questioned if this is the <br />best way to get traffic in and out. <br /> <br /> -Inc. <br /> <br />Presentation <br /> <br />Associate Planner Geisler <br />construct a new Sluml: <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski stated there is a little more than 100 feet between the two entrances. <br />lie indicated these are not public streets, so there will be less traffic than a public street. He <br />stated lac thinks the 100 foot separation is okay, but maybe ~ombined access would be better. <br /> <br />Chan'pcrson N~xt asked ~f 138 ~s a 30 mph street <br />City Engineer Ja~owski stated it is not a collectdrskdet. <br />Commissioner Van Scoy clanhed that Staff does no~e?thig:?oses a si ~:;~:~fe;t9 issue. <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski stated it does not. -5(~);??;~;~)~ 7~;::¢':~:~ <br /> <br />Commissioner Van Scoy asked if the proof ofp~g would ;~iliked if necessary. <br /> <br />Assocmtc Planner Gmsler stated that ~s co~ect, ~n&ca~g;~they are not proposing parking there <br />now; it would be landscaped green space;' .... <br /> <br />Motion by Chairperson Nixt, seconde&by CommlS'~ione :~n to-recommend that the Ci~ <br />Council approve the proposed site plan ~6ntin~nt: upon;~:6~pliance with the Ci~ Staff review <br />letter dated August 3, 2065. ' ~'~¢~::"-- <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Cha~erson Nixt, C6~:mi~sioners Jo~s0n, Levine, Shepherd, and <br />Van Secy. Voting No: None. Absenf:-: Commissioners Brauer and Watson. <br /> <br /> · ..5' ,~:.::.,7:. <br /> e .11 Request for Site Pl-a~R~View of Slumberland; Case of Larson Enterprises, <br /> <br /> ',d that Larson Enterprises has applied for site plan review to <br /> property located on Riverdale Drive and 139th Lane, <br />south of'Highway 10. She stated the a 34,727 square-foot retail furniture store <br />on a 2.74-acre lot, to. be ci:eated~ as a part of R Lek Village 2na Addition. She indicated that <br />lot coverage for the .site plan has been calculated at which is under the 35% lot coverage <br />allowed by City Code. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Geisler stated the building elevation plan indicates taterials will consist <br />of concrete block, which complies with City Code. She indicated Staff has about <br />the long, unbroken fhgade proposed for the Riverdale Drive frontage, and is from <br />thc Planning Commission on this point. <br /> <br />Planning Commission/August 8, 2005 <br /> Page 27 of 29 <br /> <br /> <br />