Laserfiche WebLink
l~roo£/ield ~'~ddition <br />Preliminary Plat Review <br />.Jz.dy ;29, 2005 <br />Revised: September 9, 2005 <br /> <br />Den.si~: The R-1 Residential r%u]ations Eot the MUSA ~rea ~How a net densi~ oE ~ units per <br />acre. As submitted, the proposed prelimina~ plat has a net densi~ of approximately 1.9 u~ts <br />per acre. <br /> <br />Other Lot Requirements: Trott Brook is a designated tributary of the Rum River, and is subject <br />to Scenic River and Shoreland Management requirements. Additional lot standards required <br />under these roles include a 75-foot lot width at the OHW of Trott Brook, a 100-foot setback from <br />the ()llW, controlled vegetative cutting within this 100-foot setback, and a 25% impervious <br />surface limitation fbr lots fronting the brook. The preliminary plat complies with all of these <br />standards, with the exception of the 75-foot lot width requirement as measured at the brook. Staff <br />has had discussions with DNR Staff, who explained that the intent of the Shoreland lot width <br />requirement is to ensure that sufficient lot area is provided. Because of the large lot sizes on the <br />Trott Brook, DNR Sta/~'f ~'eels the intent of the requirement is being met. <br /> <br />The preliminary plat submittal indicates that there is one existing building in the northern part of <br />the plat and several in the southern portion of the plat near 166th Avenue. It appears that only the <br />existing home 'on 166th Avenue will remain after platting. All other outbuildings must be <br />removed; City Code does not permit accessory buildings to be located on a parcel separate from <br />the main dwelling. <br /> <br />Landscaping/Tree Preservation Plan: The following comments are offered regarding the <br />landscaping plan: <br /> Additional screening along Nowthen Blvd should be provided for Lots 1 & 12 Block 1 <br /> and Lot 12 Block 2. <br /> o Small cranberry (/accinium oxycoccus) must be replaced with a larger species more <br /> appropriately sized for screening and that is better suited for this site (small cranberry is <br /> more appropriate for bogs/marsh areas). <br /> · Planting schedule should include the Latin nomenclature as well as the common name of <br /> the plant material. <br /> <br />revised landscaping plan is needed that addresses these concerns. <br /> <br />The tree preservation plan is acceptable. However, due to the presence of oak trees on and <br />adjacent to the development area; a plan must be submitted outlining the actions that will be <br />taken to protect those trees f?om oak wilt. Any clearing involving oak trees cannot occur <br />between April 15 and July 15 to help protect against oak wilt. <br /> <br />Density Transition: Currently, City Code requires density transitioning between the proposed <br />smgle-lhmily urban lots and the surrounding single-family rural lots. City Code establishes <br />several options to achieve the transitioning including landscaping, existing topographical <br />l'camres, or matching densities on common boundaries. It is City Staff's opinion that the existing <br />wetland and conservation easement along the north boundary and the existing wetlands along the <br />southern part of Block 11 of the plat serve as an adequate transition between the urban lots and <br /> <br /> <br />