My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 09/27/2005
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2005
>
Agenda - Council - 09/27/2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 1:56:37 PM
Creation date
9/23/2005 2:38:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
09/27/2005
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
348
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Case#5 Request for Site Plan Review of Harber Industries; Case of Harber <br /> Industries <br /> <br />Presentation <br /> <br />Associate Planner Dalnes advised that Harber Industries sUbmitted a site plan for the <br />development of a manufacturing facility on the property located at 6690 Sunwood Drive, on the <br /> <br />corner of Bunker Lake Boulevard and Sunwood Drive. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Dalnes stated that the property is <br />indicated that manuhcturing is a permi~ed use <br />She stated that the proposed building has a total <br />setbacks. She indicated the future addition <br />process, and will need to be revised prior to <br />rear yard setbacks. <br /> <br />District. She <br />will be for book binding. <br />onforms to all required <br />review <br />not meet <br /> <br />Associate Planner Dalnes indicated that the buildih <br />variety o1" materials and textures such as rock, block face, <br />proposed building will look similar to ne <br />landscaping plan outlines a variety of <br />landscaping requirements. She stated <br />to increase the variety, and a new plan ~lI:bb <br /> <br />Associate Planner Dalnes stated that all Pgrk de3iCation, <br />sewer trunk fbes will be paid through the <br />between the owner of the property and the <br />recommends site plan approval contingent upon <br />August 25, 2005. ~ <br /> <br /> ~atisfactory and consist of a <br /> panels. She stated the <br /> indicated that the <br /> and conforms to all <br />Letter there is a recommendation <br /> <br />management, and water and <br />Financing agreement established <br />She indicated that City Staff <br />with City Staff Review Letter dated <br /> <br />Commission Input ..... ' ?";'~ i. <br />Chairperson Nixt asked if the. applicant haS~'~iewed the Staff.Review Letter. <br /> <br />The applicant indicated he has~ <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt noted that there i~ a potential future issue with the proposed expansion.that was <br />noted by Staff, and landscape recommendations. He asked if the applicant has any problems <br />with those comments. ' :"' <br /> <br />The applicant indicated he does not, and will make the changes recommended by Staff. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt asked if the applicant has given any thought to the setback issues. <br /> <br />The applicant stated if it means they have to shrink the expansion they will do that. He indicated <br />he is working with an architect to try to accommodate the size and the parking. <br /> <br />Planning Commission/September 1, 2005 <br /> Page 16 of 20 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.