My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Planning Commission - 10/03/2000
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Planning Commission
>
2000
>
Minutes - Planning Commission - 10/03/2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/20/2025 2:13:50 PM
Creation date
5/22/2003 9:36:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
10/03/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
· Increasing the tower height in residential zones from 75 to 120 feet (designed for at least <br /> three antennas). <br />· Co-location radius was increased from ½ mile to one mile. <br /> <br />Citizen Input <br /> <br />There was none. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Wivoda, seconded by Commissioner Dempsey, to close the public <br />hearing. <br /> <br />Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Vice-Chairperson Kociscak, Commissioners Wivoda, Dempsey, <br />Griffiths, and Reeve. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />The public hearing closed at 8:48 p.m. <br /> <br />Commission Business <br /> <br />Vice-Chairperson Kociscak called the regular meeting of the Planning Commission back to order <br />at 8:48 p.m. <br /> <br />Commissioner Wivoda stated that Section 9.15.08 subdivision c addresses the setback <br />requirements which is already addressed in section 9.15.03 and questioned if it is necessary in <br />both places. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Frolik replied that it should be removed from section 9.15.03. <br /> <br />Commissioner Wivoda stated that it is relatively common for TV towers and amateur towers to <br />be against the house and questioned if they want to exclude that type of use. <br /> <br />Commissioner Reeve stated that if the setback requirement is 1.5 times the height of the tower, <br />then a TV antenna or amateur radio antenna would not fit on a residential property that has a <br />home on it. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Frolik noted that private TV antennas and amateur towers are <br />exempt from that setback requirement. She inquired if the proposed setback requirement should <br />be from neighboring homes or the house on the property. <br /> <br />Commissioner Wivoda replied that he felt the setback should be from neighboring homes. <br /> <br />Vice-Chairperson Kociscak inquired if there should be a minimum setback requirement for the <br />home on the property. <br /> <br />Planning Commission/October 3, 2000 <br /> Page 12 of 16 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.