Laserfiche WebLink
Roadway Network <br />A total of six forecast scenarios were prepared for the CSAH 5 Corridor Traffic Study. This includes <br />existing year 2018 conditions along with five scenarios representing future year 2040 conditions. The <br />following scenarios were included in the CSAH 5 Corridor Traffic Study: <br />• Existing (2018) - year 2018 SE data and the year 2018 roadway network <br />• 2040 No Improvement — year 2040 SE data with year 2018 roadway network <br />• 2040 Baseline — year 2040 SE data with all programmed improvements; CSAH 5 as 2-lane <br />undivided with 8-foot shoulders <br />• 2040 Alternative 1 — year 2040 SE data; CSAH 5 as 2-lane rural section with painted center <br />median, 8-foot shoulders, and left and/or right turn lanes at major intersections <br />• 2040 Alternative 2 — year 2040 SE data; CSAH 5 as 2-lane rural section with a raised center <br />median, 8-foot shoulders, and left and/or right turn lanes at major intersections <br />• 2040 Alternative 3 — year 2040 SE data; CSAH 5 as 4-lane rural section with a raised center <br />median, 8-foot shoulders, and left and/or right turn lanes at major intersections <br />Additionally, the following programmed roadway capacity improvements within the study area were <br />incorporated into the AB1MI roadway network for the year 2040 Baseline and Alternative Scenarios: <br />• Highway 47 and County Road 116/Bunker Lake Boulevard intersection improvements <br />• Highway 47/169 resurfacing <br />• Highway 10 Ramsey Boulevard /Sunfish Lake Boulevard interchange construction <br />• Highway 10 Rum River bridge replacement and corridor improvements <br />• Fairoak/Thurston/W Main Street interchange construction <br />• Highway 47 BNSF Railroad grade separation <br />• Highway 10 strategic congestion mitigation <br />• Highway 10 at Round Lake Boulevard intersection improvements <br />• Highway 169 Redefine/freeway construction <br />,IIIP .P4 1:101311q,,,,,1 orroo c 1:1: i,..110 iiil:: °l 1,1i3 <br />For this study, the AB1MI validation was reviewed in the study area shown in Figure 1. Validation is <br />defined as the degree to which the travel demand model replicates known ground counts. The traffic <br />counts used for the validation were obtained from the 1\InDOT Traffic Forecasting and Analysis <br />published data. Based on the AB1MI validation review completed for this study, the model validates to <br />accepted industry standards. <br />Daily traffic forecasts were prepared for the No Improvement scenario to capture the growth in the <br />study area due to development growth. The No Improvement scenario forecasts are shown in Figure 2. <br />11 <br />