My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Public Works Committee - 09/19/2000
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Public Works Committee
>
2000 - 2009
>
2000
>
Minutes - Public Works Committee - 09/19/2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 10:00:46 AM
Creation date
5/22/2003 11:09:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Public Works Committee
Document Date
09/19/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
diameter trees along this one-half mile segment of roadway. These trees would be placed on the <br />narrowed segments and be spaced 35 feet apart. Sidewalk could also be added to further enhance <br />pedestrian safety at an estimated cost of $27,600 per side. In Summary, 'depending on the options <br />selected, a new streetscape for the one-half mile section of Dysprosium Street NW could range <br />from $116,000 for just the narrowed pavement with sod restoration and a new overlay surface, to <br />$184,200 which would include terrace trees and sidewalks on both sides of the street. In any <br />event it should be anticipated that $57,000 would be required in the near future for the overlay of <br />the existing 48 foot wide street. <br /> <br />Councilmember Zimmerman inquired if the road was narrowed would it still stay an MSA street. <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski replied that the minimum width requirement for an MSA street is 26 <br />feet so if the changes were made Dysprosium Street would still be considered an MSA street. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen inquired if the cost of the overlay would be assessed to the <br />homeowners. <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski replied yes, explaining that the City would collect the average fee of <br />what they are charging for overlays for residential streets at the time the overlay was completed. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen stated that if any change is made to Dysprosium Street it should be <br />treated as a public improvement project. He explained that there is a provision in the City <br />Charter for the citizens to initiate actions for a public improvement pro,iect. He stated that the <br />first thing the City should do is approach MnDOT and explain that the Council feels that it is <br />reasonable to keep the speed humps and if MnDOT insist that the speed humps be removed and <br />the residents want a change to be made to Dysprosium street then it should be considered as a <br />public improvement project with a portion of the project cost being assessed to the residents. Mr. <br />Hendriksen suggested presenting different options to the residents along Dysprosium street and <br />inform them of the approximate cost that would be assessed to them for the various projects. <br /> <br />Councilmember Zimmerman inquired if there was a similar MSA street within the City of <br />Ramsey that would have recently received an overlay that staff could compare Dysprosium street <br />with. <br /> <br />Director of Public Works Kapler replied that 167th Avenue is an MSA street that recently <br />received an overlay. <br /> <br />Councilmember Zimmerman stated that he wants to be certain that the City is treating everyone <br />the same that have access onto an MSA street. <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski replied that the City takes an average of the overlay costs for that year <br />to determine the cost to be assessed to residents on MSA streets and then the City pays half of <br />that cost. <br /> <br />Public Works Committee/September 19, 2000 <br /> Page 9 of 13 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.