My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 02/09/2006
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
2006
>
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 02/09/2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 1:42:03 PM
Creation date
2/3/2006 3:13:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Parks and Recreation Commission
Document Date
02/09/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Associate Planner Weld explained it would depend on demand, and the City's ability to <br />service the area, so it is difficult to say. <br /> <br />Commissioner Brauer suggested the concerned neighbors keep their ears open for more <br />on the Comprehensive Plan Amendment public hearings. <br /> <br />rvh:. Rowbotham asked how large ora holding tank this would be, and how often [t would <br />be pumped. <br /> <br />Ivh-. Stradlund indicated it has a drainage field. He stated the system he is looking at is <br />similar to a residential system with a larger holding tank and larger drainage field. He <br />stated with a common septic there is also greater separation fi.om the wells, which is an <br />added benefit. <br /> <br />Commissioner Bmuer stated it might reassure the neighbors if 1Mr. Stradlund could bring <br />in a plan for landscaping on and around the septic area. <br /> <br />Nh'. Stradlund indicated it would pretty much be a green field, but he can show the <br />neighbors, lie stated there is also an example in Burns that they can look at if they <br />choose. <br /> <br />Dale Lent. z, 17800 Fluorine Street IWW' questioned why the City is letting someone put <br />houses on such small lots, and why they are allowing, ,8 lots on 40 acres. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Weld indicated the cul-de-sac is not connected to that cul-de-sac, <br />showing how it comes offErldum Street and 177m Avenue, not Fluorine and 177th Lane. <br /> <br />Mr. Lentz stated is other question is why the City is letting someone put houses on such <br />small lots, and why they are allowing 38 lots on 40 acres. <br /> <br />Chairperson NLxt advised that in order for the applicant to develop 16 lets now it is a <br />requirement of the review that he show how the rest of the land might be developed in an <br />'as if' proposal, lie stated that before more than. 16 lots could be developed there would <br />have to be City sewer and water, as well as another review process similar to this one. <br /> <br />17 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.