My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council - 03/28/2000
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council
>
2000
>
Minutes - Council - 03/28/2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 1:58:47 PM
Creation date
5/22/2003 12:40:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
03/28/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
had nothing to do with any preliminary plat, but he would be willing to discuss the issue further <br />if the Council felt it necessary to do so. Any of the land that is developed to the west of Andrie <br />Street will be required to pay the most recent park dedication fees. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Hendriksen, seconded by Councilmember Connolly, to approve the <br />preliminary plat approval to Northfork Highlands Second Addition contingent upon developer <br />compliance with City Staff Review Letter dated March 1, 2000. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilmembers Hendriksen, Connolly, Anderson, <br />and Zimmerman. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Case #6: <br /> <br />Request for Preliminary Plat Approval of Northfork Oaks 4th Addition; Case <br />of North Fork, Inc. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Frolik stated that North Fork, Inc. is requesting preliminary <br />plat approval of Northfork Oaks 4th Addition. The plat consists of six new lots and the replat of <br />two existing lots in the northeast comer of the Northfork PUD. The subject plat was part of a <br />larger area that received preliminary plat approval in 1995 as Northfork Oaks 2nd Addition. <br />Northfork Oaks 2'~ Addition consisted of 73 acres proposed to be developed with 37 single- <br />family lots. The first phase to be recorded, Northfork Oaks 2nd Addition, consisted of 10 lots and <br />Northfork Oaks 3T~ Addition consisted of 21 lots. The preliminary plat for Northfork Oaks 2na <br />Addition expired prior to the remaining six lots being recorded. Therefore, the applicant was <br />required to obtain a new plat approval for the final six lots prior to final plat approval and <br />recording. North Fork was also interested in straightening out the common property line <br />between Lot 6 and 7 in the Third Addition so that replat is included as a part of North Fork Oaks <br />4th Addition. The lots range in size from 1.7 to 3.4 acres, which exceeds the Northfork PUD one- <br />acre minimum lot size. Only Lot 6 meets the 160-foot lot width requirement at the 40-foot <br />building setback line. The lots are proposed to receive public access from the northerly <br />extension of Royal Road. In accordance with the May 9, 1989 Northfork Park Dedication <br />Agreement, there are no park dedication obligations to be met in this plat. However, the <br />Developer has agreed to dedicate a 35-foot linear park along the east boundary of the plat to <br />facilitate a trail link to the north. The Grading Plan identifies stands of existing trees and the <br />developer has engaged the services of Kunde Company to do a tree preservation for each <br />individual lot. The drainage plan has been reviewed by the City Engineer and is acceptable. The <br />Planning Commission held a public hearing and received one written comment from a resident in <br />Woodlawn Estates to the east. Basically, she points out the inadequacy of City Code relating to <br />tree preservation requirements and she also expressed concern that the trail will be on public <br />property. Parks/Utilities Supervisor Boos walked the area and has confirmed that the existing <br />trail will be located in what is proposed to be platted as a linear park for public purposes on the <br />east boundary of the plat. It was also noted by staff that, although the proposed plat conforms to <br />the preliminary plat approved in 1995, Lots 4, 5, and 6 do not meet the 160-foot lot width <br />minimum at the 40-foot building setback line. Because the lot size greatly exceeds the one-acre <br /> <br />City CouncilfMarch 28, 2000 <br /> Page 12 of 21 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.