Laserfiche WebLink
occasions when extended hours of operation have been necessary. In accordance with the terms <br />of their previous CUP, Commercial Asphalt always sought prior approval from the City <br />Administrator for the extended hours of operation and supplied an explanation of why the <br />extension was necessary. Based on records indicating that there have not been any complaints <br />regarding the operations of the asphalt plant, City Staff has always approved the extension of <br />hours for temporary periods of time. City Staff could not find any documented complaints about <br />the operation in the last five years. Commercial Asphalt is permitted by MPCA and they have a <br />current Air Emission Permit. The new CUP for Commercial Asphalt was drafted without an <br />expiration date, which means that the conditional use would be in effect as long as there is <br />compliance with the terms of the permit. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing <br />on February 1, 2000. One resident was not protesting the reissuance of the CUP, but noted that <br />the odors generated at the plant are sometimes objectionable when the winds are from the <br />northwest. Brent Schlueter of Commercial Asphalt committed to working with the resident on <br />these occasions. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the CUP and the case was <br />presented to the City Council on February 22, 2000. The Council noted current discussions <br />regarding redevelopment of the industrial areas around the asphalt plant and expressed concern <br />with the potential impact the plant could have on future redevelopment. Consequently, there was <br />some reluctance to grant a permit for perpetuity and the president of Commercial Asphalt, Mr. <br />Gary Sauer, stated his willingness to accept another five year permit. Council tabled action. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec inquired if the City Attorney had a chance to review the permit. <br /> <br />Councilmember Anderson questioned if the permit can be time limited. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich replied that the conditional use permit can be time limited when issued, <br />but the permit cannot be revoked unless the applicant is in violation of the permit even if there is <br />a time limit on the permit. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen inquired if the City Attorney has had discussions with the applicant. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich replied yes, explaining that Commercial Asphalt is not willing to apply <br />for an interim use permit, but would agree to a five-year time limit on the conditional use permit. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen inquired if each condition of the permit has been reviewed for <br />compliance. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Frolik replied yes. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Zimmerman, <br />Resolution #00-03-071 adopting Findings <br />request for a conditional use permit. <br /> <br />seconded by Councilmember Connolly, to adopt <br />of Fact #0510 relating to Commercial Asphalt's <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilmembers Zimmerman, Connolly, <br />Anderson, and Hendriksen. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />City Council/March 28, 2000 <br /> Page 5 of 21 <br /> <br /> <br />