My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council - 03/28/2000
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council
>
2000
>
Minutes - Council - 03/28/2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 1:58:47 PM
Creation date
5/22/2003 12:40:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
03/28/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
occasions when extended hours of operation have been necessary. In accordance with the terms <br />of their previous CUP, Commercial Asphalt always sought prior approval from the City <br />Administrator for the extended hours of operation and supplied an explanation of why the <br />extension was necessary. Based on records indicating that there have not been any complaints <br />regarding the operations of the asphalt plant, City Staff has always approved the extension of <br />hours for temporary periods of time. City Staff could not find any documented complaints about <br />the operation in the last five years. Commercial Asphalt is permitted by MPCA and they have a <br />current Air Emission Permit. The new CUP for Commercial Asphalt was drafted without an <br />expiration date, which means that the conditional use would be in effect as long as there is <br />compliance with the terms of the permit. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing <br />on February 1, 2000. One resident was not protesting the reissuance of the CUP, but noted that <br />the odors generated at the plant are sometimes objectionable when the winds are from the <br />northwest. Brent Schlueter of Commercial Asphalt committed to working with the resident on <br />these occasions. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the CUP and the case was <br />presented to the City Council on February 22, 2000. The Council noted current discussions <br />regarding redevelopment of the industrial areas around the asphalt plant and expressed concern <br />with the potential impact the plant could have on future redevelopment. Consequently, there was <br />some reluctance to grant a permit for perpetuity and the president of Commercial Asphalt, Mr. <br />Gary Sauer, stated his willingness to accept another five year permit. Council tabled action. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec inquired if the City Attorney had a chance to review the permit. <br /> <br />Councilmember Anderson questioned if the permit can be time limited. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich replied that the conditional use permit can be time limited when issued, <br />but the permit cannot be revoked unless the applicant is in violation of the permit even if there is <br />a time limit on the permit. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen inquired if the City Attorney has had discussions with the applicant. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich replied yes, explaining that Commercial Asphalt is not willing to apply <br />for an interim use permit, but would agree to a five-year time limit on the conditional use permit. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen inquired if each condition of the permit has been reviewed for <br />compliance. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Frolik replied yes. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Zimmerman, <br />Resolution #00-03-071 adopting Findings <br />request for a conditional use permit. <br /> <br />seconded by Councilmember Connolly, to adopt <br />of Fact #0510 relating to Commercial Asphalt's <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilmembers Zimmerman, Connolly, <br />Anderson, and Hendriksen. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />City Council/March 28, 2000 <br /> Page 5 of 21 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.